What we have said as to covering of the wings in treating of the
disposition of the army in general, applies here also; therefore corps
detached from the main body, right and left, although intended to fight
in conjunction with the rest, will have particular points of assembly
of their own in the same line with the main body.
Now, if we reflect that the nature of a country, on the one hand, by
favourable features in the ground determines the most natural point of
assembly, and on the other hand, by the positions of towns and villages
determines the most suitable situation for cantonments, then we must
perceive how very rarely any geometrical form can be decisive in our
present subject. But yet it was necessary to direct attention to it,
because, like all general laws, it affects the generality of cases in a
greater or less degree.
What now remains to be said as to an advantageous position for
cantonments is that they should be taken up behind some natural
obstacle of ground affording cover, whilst the sides next the enemy can
be watched by small but numerous detached parties; or they may be taken
up behind fortresses, which, when circumstances prevent any estimate
being formed of the strength of their garrisons, impose upon the enemy
a greater feeling of respect and and caution.
We reserve the subject of winter quarters, covered by defensive works
for a separate article.
The quarters taken up by troops on a march differ from those called
standing cantonments in this way, that, in order to save the troops
from unnecessary marching, cantonments on a march are taken up as much
as possible along the lines of march, and are not at any considerable
distance on either side of these roads; if their extension in this
sense does not exceed a short day’s march, the arrangement is not one
at all unfavourable to the quick concentration of the army.
In all cases in presence of the enemy, according to the technical
phrase in use, that is in all cases where there is no considerable
interval between the advance guards of the two armies respectively, the
extent of the cantonments and the time required to assemble the army
determine the strength and position of the advanced guard and outposts;
but when these must be suited to the enemy and circumstances, then, on
the contrary, the extent of the cantonments must depend on the time
which we can count upon by the resistance of the advance guard.
In the third(*) chapter of this book, we have stated how this
resistance, in the case of an advanced corps, may be estimated. From
the time of that resistance we must deduct the time required for
transmission of reports and getting the men under arms, and the
remainder only is the time available for assembling at the point of
concentration.
(*) 8th Chapter.—Tr.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account