The offensive has greater facilities than the defensive for surrounding
and cutting off the whole, as the latter is in a manner in a fixed
position while the former is in a state of movement having reference to
that position. But the superior advantage for an enveloping movement,
which the offensive possesses, as now stated, is again limited to a
movement against the whole mass; for during the course of the combat,
and with separate divisions of the force, it is easier for the
defensive than for the offensive to make attacks from several quarters,
_because, as we have already said, the former is in a better situation
to surprise by the force and form of his attacks._
That the defensive in an especial manner enjoys the assistance which
ground affords is plain in itself; as to what concerns the advantage
which the defensive has in surprising by the force and form of his
attacks, that results from the offensive being obliged to approach by
roads and paths where he may be easily observed, whilst the defensive
conceals his position, and, until almost the decisive moment, remains
invisible to his opponent.—Since the true method of defence has been
adopted, reconnaissances have gone quite out of fashion, that is to
say, they have become impossible. Certainly reconnaissances are still
made at times, but they seldom bring home much with them. Immense as is
the advantage of being able to examine well a position, and become
perfectly acquainted with it before a battle, plain as it is that he
(the defensive) who lies in wait near such a chosen position can much
more easily effect a surprise than his adversary, yet still to this
very hour the old notion is not exploded that a battle which is
accepted is half lost. This comes from the old kind of defensive
practised twenty years ago, and partly also in the Seven Years’ War,
when the only assistance expected from the ground was that it should be
difficult of approach in front (by steep mountain slopes, etc., etc.),
when the little depth of the positions and the difficulty of moving the
flanks produced such weakness that the armies dodged one another from
one hill to another, which increased the evil. If some kind of support
were found on which to rest the wings, then all depended on preventing
the army stretched along between these points, like a piece of work on
an embroidery frame, from being broken through at any point. The ground
occupied possessed a direct value at every point, and therefore a
direct defence was required everywhere. Under such circumstances, the
idea of making a movement or attempting a surprise during the battle
could not be entertained; it was the exact reverse of what constitutes
a good defence, and of that which the defence has actually become in
modern warfare.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account