All arrangements for the grand entertainment had been made before Mr.
Hillary’s household removed to Brighton. The play had been selected, the
characters allotted to the individuals who were supposed, or who
supposed themselves, to be most fitted to play them; but not without as
much shuffling and changing as the kings and queens undergo in a game of
cards. The drama finally chosen was the “Lady of Lyons,” selected, no
doubt, on that grand principle in accordance with which all amateurs go
to work, _i. e._ because it is a play which specially requires
accomplished actors in every one of its characters. Of course Maude was
to be the _Pauline_. Was she not sole daughter and heiress of the master
of the house, at whose expense all the business was to take place? If
she had been red-haired, or hump-backed, or lame, the amateurs could
scarcely have done otherwise than choose her as the representative of
the lovely _Mademoiselle Deschappelles_. But as she was one of the
fairest daughters ever spoiled by a wealthy merchant, she was really
created for the part, as it seemed; and she had only to order her
dresses and let down her sunny hair in the classic disorder of the
period, and she would be the loveliest _Pauline_ that ever won the
simple heart of an aspiring young gardener. But how about _Claude_? At
first every one of the amateurs had desired to play _Claude_, and
nothing but _Claude_. To wear that impossible velvet coat, with its
lavish embroidery of gold and spangles; to snub _Beauseant_, and to
patronize _Damas_; to flourish diamond snuff-boxes and rings, and filmy
ruffles of point d’Alençon, which are _so_ becoming to the unhappy
amateur, whose hands are apt to assume the rich purple hues of raw beef
under the influence of extreme terror; to hold Miss Hillary in their
arms, and cry, “Oh, rapture!” in a ponderous bass voice apparently
situated somewhere in those martial jackboots, without which _Claude_
would be less than _Claude_,--to do all this seemed to the young men at
the Cedars a glory and delight which would be cheaply won by the cutting
of one another’s throats in a _champ clos_.
And then to what base hypocrisies these amateur actors descended!
declaring to one another that, after all, _Claude_ was _not_ such a
great part! Nay, indeed, was not the heroic gardener something of a
spoon, liable to provoke laughter if his velvet coat failed to fit, or
his humble blouse looked too much like a little boy’s pinafore? _Claude_
might be a very fine part, the amateurs argued to each other, in a
regular theatre, where there were the gallery fellows to applaud the
long speeches, and to stamp their hob-nailed boots in the great
situations, and all that sort of thing, you know; but your drawing-room
audiences are apt to laugh at strong sentiment; and, in short, for a
private performance, _Damas_, or _Beauseant_, or _Glavis_ were the great
parts.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account