Ontology, or the Theory of BeingCoffey, P. (Peter)
Philosophy
Ontology, or the Theory of Being
Coffey, P. (Peter)
Ontology
Finally, we may say that the truth of the Divine Intellect is
_immutable_; and so is the essential conformity of all reality
with the Divine Intellect. The change to which created reality is
essentially subject is itself essentially conformed with the
Divine Mind; it is, so to speak, part and parcel of the
ontological truth of this reality in relation to the Divine Mind,
and cannot therefore interfere with this ontological truth. When
the acorn grows into the oak the whole process has its ontological
truth; that of the acorn changes, not into falsity, but into
another truth, that of the oak.(170) We see, then, that as things
change, their truth does not change in the sense of being lost or
giving place to falsity: the truth of one state changes to the
truth of another while the ontological truth of the changing
reality perseveres immutably.
The same immutability attaches to the truth of things in relation
to the human mind: with the qualification, to which we shall
return (43), that they may occasion false judgments in the human
mind, and on that account be designated “false”.
Finally, the logical truth which has its seat in created
intelligences is _mutable_: it may be increased or diminished,
acquired or lost.
42. ONTOLOGICAL TRUTH A TRANSCENDENTAL ATTRIBUTE OF REALITY.—From what has
been said it will be apparent that ontological truth is a transcendental
attribute of reality. That is to say, whatever is real, whether actual or
possible, is ontologically true; or, in scholastic terminology, “_Omne ens
est verum; Ens et verum convertuntur_: All being is true; The real and the
true are convertible terms”. For in the first place there is no mode or
category of real being, of which the human mind actually thinks, to which
it does not attribute ontological truth in the sense of conformity with
the right human conception of it. Moreover, the proper object of the human
intellect is reality; all true knowledge is knowledge of reality. Reality
of itself is manifestly knowable, intelligible, and thus potentially or
fundamentally true; and, on the other hand, intellect is, according to the
measure of its capacity, a faculty of insight into all reality, into
whatever is real: _intellectus potens fieri omnia; anima ... quodammodo
fit omnia_.(171) Deny either of these postulates regarding the terms of
the ontological relation, reality and mind, and all rational thought is
instantly paralysed. Hence, in so far as a reality becomes an actual
object of human knowledge it has formal ontological truth in relation both
to the human mind and to the Divine Mind; while antecedently to human
thought it is fundamentally true, or intelligible, to the human mind, and
of course formally true in relation to the Divine Mind.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account