Ontology, or the Theory of BeingCoffey, P. (Peter)
Philosophy
Ontology, or the Theory of Being
Coffey, P. (Peter)
Ontology
But must the human mind conceive a possible essence as having
_some_ ideal being _necessarily_? No; unless that mind has already
convinced itself, from a study of _actual_ things, that an
Eternal, Necessary, Omniscient Intelligence exists: to which, of
course, such essences would be eternally and necessarily present
as objects of thought. If the human mind had already reached this
conviction it could then see that “even if there were no human
intellect, things would still be true in relation to the Divine
Intellect. But if both intellects were, _per impossibile_,
conceived as non-existent truth would persist no longer.”(101)
Suppose, therefore, that it has not yet reached this conviction,
or abstracts altogether from the existence of God as known from
_actual_ things; and then, further, imagines the actual things of
its experience and all human intellects and finite intellects of
whatsoever kind as non-existent: must it still conceive possible
things as possible? No; possibility and impossibility, truth and
falsity will now have ceased to have any meaning. After such
attempted abstraction the mind would have before it only what
Balmes describes as “the abyss of nothing”. And Balmes is right in
saying that the mind is unable “to abstract all existence”. But
the reason of the inability is not, as Balmes contends, because
when it has removed actual things and finite minds there still
remains in spite of it a system or order of possible essences
which forces it to infer and posit the existence of an Eternal,
Necessary Mind as the source and ground of that order. The reason
rather is because the mind sees that the known _actual_ things,
from which it got all its notions of possible essences,
necessarily imply, as the only intelligible ground of their
actuality, the existence of a Necessary Being, in whose
Intelligence they must have been contained ideally, and in whose
Omnipotence they must have been contained virtually, from all
eternity. From contingent _actuality_, as known to it, the mind
can argue to the eternal actuality of Necessary Being, and to the
impossibility either of a state of absolute nothingness, or of an
order of purely possible things apart from all actuality.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account