Opus 21: Descriptive Music for the Lower Kinsey Epoch of the Atomic Age, a Concerto for a One-man Band, Six Arias for Soap Operas, Fugues, Anthems & BarrelhouseWylie, Philip
Philosophy
Opus 21: Descriptive Music for the Lower Kinsey Epoch of the Atomic Age, a Concerto for a One-man Band, Six Arias for Soap Operas, Fugues, Anthems & Barrelhouse
Wylie, Philip
Authors -- Fiction; New York (N.Y.) -- Social life and customs -- 20th century -- Fiction; Patients -- Fiction; Philosophy -- Fiction
"Psychobiological immortality. Only--modern man, being so pompous about
what goes on in his cortex and repressing so much of what goes on in
the rest of his brain, has construed the 'immortal' aspect of instinct
as a property of his ego. The natural urge to live through his species,
through kids--to love, that is--to be man's father--is drained off into
the asinine notion that his personal ego will live in a slap-happy
eternity."
"Man," said Tom, "has a pretty damned powerful feeling about that
personal immortality. Hard to shake."
"Why not? It's fashioned out of his most powerful instinct. The one
that supports life itself, reproduction, and that at least accompanies
evolution. Man takes that billion-year-old galaxy of instincts, filters
it through his cortex, and comes up with the idea of Heaven. It's a
childish mistake. But even a child, when it's mistaken about the actual
nature of an instinct, still has as powerful a compulsion in his error
as he would have if he were correct. Say he's frightened by something
that isn't really frightful: he's still just as much afraid. And
we--most of us--are in that state about pretty much all of our inner
selves."
"And have been, you think, for a long while?"
"Sure. Since thousands of years before Christ. You guys in medicine
ought to quit studying tissue per se--and study its functioning some
more. Contemporary man--as a rule--never gets even a glimmering of how
his personality is split and how the conscious part can bamboozle the
unconscious part--and believe it has got away with it. You know the
fact--you ignore the implications. For instance, Tom, we actually see
upside-down, right?"
"Sure."
"In our first few weeks--as babies, we react according to the fact of
our vision. We want to grab the top of something--but we reach for the
bottom--because human vision is inverted."
"It is."
"We learn--by experience--that we see upside-down. As we age--month by
month--we develop a 'mind' that makes the correction for us. By the
time we're some months old, everything 'looks' rightside-up. And only
once in a while, under peculiar conditions, does anybody's mind ever
glimpse the world the way his eyes see it--inverted."
"So what?"
"So--that is an example of useful autohypnosis. An immensely potent
example. It shows how the 'mind' can establish a set of facts directly
opposite to those observed by the eyes. A mind that can go through life
looking at an inverted world but 'seeing' it the way it is--manifestly
is capable of accepting almost any degree of suggestion from its other
parts, and its various senses--of accepting true suggestion or false
suggestion. Manifestly, it isn't necessarily 'right' or 'wrong' about
anything not proven."
"An argument for empiricism."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account