ΝΕΚΡΟΚΗΔΕΙΑ; Or, the Art of Embalming;: Wherein Is Shewn the Right of Burial, and Funeral Ceremonies, Especially That of Preserving Bodies After the Egyptian Method. Together With an Account of the Egyptian Mummies, Pyramids, Subterranean Vaults and Lamps, and Their Opinion of the Metempsychosis, the Cause of Their Embalming. As Also a Geographical Description of Egypt, the Rise and Course of the Nile, the Temper, Constitution and Physic of the Inhabitants, Their Inventions, Arts, Sciences, StupGreenhill, Thomas
Philosophy
ΝΕΚΡΟΚΗΔΕΙΑ; Or, the Art of Embalming;: Wherein Is Shewn the Right of Burial, and Funeral Ceremonies, Especially That of Preserving Bodies After the Egyptian Method. Together With an Account of the Egyptian Mummies, Pyramids, Subterranean Vaults and Lamps, and Their Opinion of the Metempsychosis, the Cause of Their Embalming. As Also a Geographical Description of Egypt, the Rise and Course of the Nile, the Temper, Constitution and Physic of the Inhabitants, Their Inventions, Arts, Sciences, Stup
Greenhill, Thomas
Burial -- Early works to 1800; Embalming -- Early works to 1800; Funeral rites and ceremonies -- Early works to 1800; Mummies -- Early works to 1800
this Author makes it; whence, without doubt, those that did this pious
and necessary Office towards preserving the Dead, must needs have been
equally honour’d with the _Embalmers_, and what seems yet clearly to
confirm this, is that sometimes the _Art of Embalming_ has been call’d
_Honesta Anatomia_.
Now the Instrument with which this Incision was made was an _Ethiopic_
Stone call’d _Basaltes_, [Sidenote: _Basaltes_ an _Ethiopic_ Stone.] and
nam’d from its hardness and colour like to Iron, that word in the
_Ethiopic_ Language signifying Iron, and this Stone being much harder
than that Metal, it might very probably be whet to a keen edge or point,
and so be ceremonially us’d instead of an Incision-Knife, like as the
antient _Jews_ were wont to use Knives made of Flints in their
Circumcision, _Joshua_ 5. 2.
[Sidenote: The _Embowelling_ a Corps.]
As to the Exenteration or Embowelling the Body, we are not to imagine
they drew out only the Brain and Guts, but likewise the Lungs, Stomach,
Liver, Spleen, and other _Viscera_, except the Heart and Kidnies, which
being carnous and fleshy might very likely be left, as being easier to
be preserv’d than the moist parts. The former they might probably leave
to be _Embalm’d_, as being the principal Bowel of the whole Body, and
source of vital Heat (wherefore it has been frequently preserv’d apart
by several People) but for what Reason, or out of what Superstition they
left the latter I cannot readily conjecture.
Then having empty’d the Head, Breast and Belly of their Contents, they
first wash’d and cleans’d them with Phænician or Palm-Wine, compounded
of aromatic Spices and sweet Odours, [Sidenote: The _Body_ stuff’d with
medicinal Ingredients.] and afterwards stuff’d them with a mixture of
sweet scented Drugs, Spices and Balsams, such as _Myrrh_, _Aloes_,
_Saffron_, _Cassia_ or _Cinamon_, _Opobalsamum_ and the like,
_Frankincense_ only being excepted, because that was by them consecrated
to their Gods. These Ingredients had not only a power to preserve the
Body for a long Time, but also gave it a sweet and agreeable Smell. This
done, they sew’d up the Incision or Passage thro’ which they drew forth
the Bowels; but _Antonius Santorellus_ in his _Post-Praxis Medica_, p.
136. not without Reason observes, That tho’ Aromatics are of a drying
quality, yet as they are likewise heating, they may occasion a
Fermentation in the Body; therefore I am apt to think _Myrrh_ and
_Aloes_ were the basis of the Composition, and that Aromatics were us’d
only in small quantities, and that rather to conciliate a grateful Odour
to the Body than preserve it from Putrifaction. Yet I am not ignorant at
the same time of what some alledge of Aromatics, that by their innate
balsamic Virtue, by their bitterness and oleaginous Sulphur, or
penetrability of their volatil Salts, they resist Putrifaction. Neither
am I ignorant of what _Bellonius_ affirms, Lib. 2. _De Medicato Funere_,
p. 27.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account