Draft -- Great Britain; Great Britain -- Defenses; World War, 1914-1918
Of the commentators upon this speech the greater part were Liberals,
and these condemned his utterances with unanimity in somewhat violent
language. Official Unionism was dubious, uncomfortable, and
disapproving: it remained for the most part dumb. A few voices were
raised from this quarter in open reprobation; a few others proclaimed
their independence of party discipline and hastened to approve his
sentiments.
There was no doubt of one thing--Lord Roberts's speech had at last
aroused public interest. For the first time during the National
Service agitation {333} blood had been drawn. This was mainly due to
the object-lesson in the consequences of military unpreparedness, which
the first Balkan War was just then unfolding before the astonished eyes
of Europe. In addition, those people, who for a year past had been
puzzling their heads over the true meaning of the Agadir crisis, had
become impressed with the urgent need for arriving at a clear decision
with regard to the adequacy of our national defences.
[Sidenote: NEED FOR NATIONAL SERVICE]
The speech was a lucid and forcible statement of the need for
compulsory military training. It was interesting reading at the time
it was delivered, and in some respects it is even more interesting
to-day. It was compactly put together, not a thing of patches. A man
who read any part of it would read it all. Yet in accordance with
custom, controversy raged around three isolated passages.
The _first_ of these runs as follows: "In the year 1912, our German
friends, I am well aware, do not--at least in sensible circles--assert
dogmatically that a war with Great Britain will take place this year or
next; but in their heart of hearts they know, every man of them,
that--just as in 1866 and just as in 1870--war will take place the
instant the German forces by land and sea are, by their superiority at
every point, as certain of victory as anything in human calculation can
be made certain. Germany strikes when Germany's hour has struck. That
is the time-honoured policy of her Foreign Office. That was the policy
relentlessly pursued by Bismarck and Moltke in 1866 and 1870. It has
been her policy decade by decade since that date. It is her policy at
the present hour."
{334}
The _second_ passage followed upon the first: "It is an excellent
policy. It is or should be the policy of every nation prepared to play
a great part in history. Under that policy Germany has, within the
last ten years, sprung, as at a bound, from one of the weakest of naval
powers to the greatest naval power, save one, upon this globe."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account