Draft -- Great Britain; Great Britain -- Defenses; World War, 1914-1918
This article set the tone of criticism. The _Manchester Guardian_
protested against the "insinuation that the German Government's views
of international {340} policy are less scrupulous and more cynical than
those of other Governments." Germany has never been accused with
justice "of breaking her word, of disloyalty to her engagements, or of
insincerity. Prussia's character among nations is, in fact, not very
different from the character which Lancashire men give to themselves as
compared with other Englishmen. It is blunt, straightforward, and
unsentimental...." How foolish, moreover, are our fears of Germany
when we come to analyse them. "We have no territory that she could
take, except, in tropical Africa, which no sane man would go to war
about. Our self-governing colonies could not in any case be held by
force; and Canada is protected in addition by the Monroe doctrine.
Egypt is not ours to cede. Malta could not be had without war with
Italy nor India without war with Russia."[6]
This was a proud statement of the basis of British security, and one
which must have warmed the hearts, and made the blood of Cromwell and
Chatham tingle in the shades. Egypt, which we had rescued from a chaos
of civil war, bankruptcy, and corruption, which during more than thirty
years we had administered as just stewards for the benefit of her
people, which we had saved from conquest and absorption by savage
hordes--Egypt was not ours to cede. For the rest our dependencies were
not worth taking from us, while our 'colonies' could defend themselves.
By the grace of Italy's protection we should be secured in the
possession of Malta. India would be preserved to us by the goodwill of
Russia, and Canada by the strong arm of the United States.... {341}
Such at that time were the views of the Liberal journal foremost in
character and ability.
[Sidenote: A UNIONIST ATTACK]
Somewhat later the _Daily News_ took the field, making up for lost time
by an exuberance of misconstruction.... "The whole movement as
represented by the National Service League is definitely unmasked as an
attempt to get up, not defence, but an invasion of German territory.
This discovery, which for years has been suspected, is most valuable as
showing up the real object of the League, with its glib talk about
military calisthenics. Lord Roberts may have been indiscreet, but at
least he has made it clear that what the League wants is war."[7]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account