Origin of the 'Reorganized' Church and the Question of SuccessionSmith, Joseph Fielding
History
Origin of the 'Reorganized' Church and the Question of Succession
Smith, Joseph Fielding
Latter Day Saint churches -- Government; Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints -- Government
The Lord did not tell Abraham that the children of Ham were cursed as
pertaining to the Priesthood, and then command Joseph Smith of the
"Reorganization" to be slow in ordaining them. In the "Reorganized"
Church they have a few, at least, of the negro race, that they have
"ordained to the priesthood" but it is contrary to the word of God.
This Reorganite revelation is spurious.
Here is an extract from another:
"The quorum of twelve, my servants, may choose and appoint one of
their number to take the place of my servant Alexander H. Smith,
and _if they shall choose William H. Kelley_, from among them
for this place, _it will be pleasing unto me_; NEVERTHELESS, IF
_directed by the spirit of revelation_ and _wisdom_ they _may
choose another_." (Sec. 124:3).
Can any sane man believe that the Lord gave this "revelation?" Did He
not know His mind and will, was not _His_ the "spirit of revelation and
wisdom?" or was there a disagreement on the point between the Lord and
the Holy Spirit?
Other extracts might be given from these alleged "revelations" showing
their inconsistency, but this will suffice. I have not given these in
the spirit of ridicule, but for the purpose of opening the eyes of
the blind that they might see, and seeing understand. Let our friends
straighten out a few things of this kind among themselves, then they
can the better attack us on the point of revelation.
At this point I desire to consider another matter. At the Salt Lake
Conference, held March 19, 1905, not long after the return of President
Joseph F. Smith from the investigation in Washington, he addressed the
Saints on the subject of revelation. In the course of his remarks, he
referred to his testimony and said:
"Now, with reference to the principle and doctrine of revelation,
it may be proper for me to say a few words on this subject while
I am on my feet. For me to say, which was the very end that my
critics and inquisitors were endeavoring to get me to say, in order
that I might be led into that trap which they had made for me, to
say that God had given to me a revelation upon some new doctrine,
or theory, or principle, or precept, or anything to be written,
to be observed, or handed down as a guide to the Church, would
have been untrue. I could not have said that, for He has not done
this. But has God revealed to me His mind and His will? Has He made
manifest to me a knowledge of His truth by and through the Spirit
of revelation? Did you ever hear of my denying that? No; no man has
ever heard me deny that.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account