Authors, Irish -- 19th century -- Biography; Wilde, Oscar, 1854-1900
Wilde's history is a totally new one, and deserves close examination.
Given that it could be proved that the young actor to whom he maintains
the Sonnets were addressed ever had a real existence, and the matter
would be as good as proved, but that is the weak point in his armour.
Mayhap some enthusiast may, by digging amongst old deeds and papers,
light upon some reference to him, but until then his hypothesis can be
only regarded as an ingenious, though highly interesting speculation.
Parenthetically it may be mentioned, although the fact is only known to
very few, that an artist friend of Oscar Wilde, whose work is the
admiration of all connoisseurs, had, under his direction, painted
exactly such a panel-portrait as described, employing all the arts of
the forger of antiquities in its production, and that a young poet whose
recently published volume of verse had caused considerable sensation in
literary circles had sat for the likeness.
The points Wilde advances in confirmation of his theory are as
follows:--
1. That the young man to whom Shakespeare addresses sonnets must
have been someone who was really a vital factor in the development
of his dramatic art, and that this could not be said of either Lord
Pembroke or Lord Southampton.
2. That the Sonnets, as we learn from Meres, were written before
1598 and that his friendship with W. H. had already lasted three
years when Sonnet CIV. was written, which would fix the date of its
commencement as 1594, or at latest 1595, that Lord Pembroke was born
in 1580 and did not come to London till he was eighteen (_i.e._
1598) so that Shakespeare could not have met him till after the
sonnet had been written; and that Pembroke's father did not die till
1601, whereas W. H.'s father was dead in 1598, as is proved by the
line--
"You had a father, let your son say so."
3. That Lord Southampton had early in life become the lover of
Elizabeth Vernon, so required no urging to enter the state of
matrimony, that he was not dowered with good looks, and that he did
not remember his mother as W. H. did. (Thou art thy mother's glass,
and she in thee calls back the lovely April of her prime), and
moreover that his Christian name being Henry he could not be the
Will to whom the punning sonnets (CXXXV. and CXLIII.) are addressed.
4. That W. H. is none other than the boy actor for whom Shakespeare
created the parts of Viola, Imogen, Juliet, Rosalind, Portia,
Desdemona and Cleopatra.
5. That the boy's name was Hughes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account