Our Legal Heritage : 600-1776 King Aethelbert - King George IIIReilly, S. A.
History
Our Legal Heritage : 600-1776 King Aethelbert - King George III
Reilly, S. A.
Law -- England -- History
Infirmaries were supported by a tax of the king levied on nearby
counties. The walls, ditches, gutters, sewers, and bridges on
waterways and the coast were kept in repair by laborers hired by
commissions appointed by the Chancellor. Those who benefited from
these waterways were taxed for the repairs in proportion to their
use thereof.
Alabaster was sculptured into tombs surmounted with a recumbent
effigy of the deceased, and effigies of mourners on the sides. Few
townsmen choose to face death alone and planned memorial masses to
be sung to lift his soul beyond Purgatory. Chantries were built by
wealthy men for this purpose.
Chemical experimentation was still thought to be akin to sorcery,
so was forbidden by King Henry IV in 1404.
Gold was minted into coins: noble, half noble, and farthing.
King Henry IV lost power to the Commons and the Lords because he
needed revenue from taxes and as a usurper King, he did not carry
the natural authority of a King. The Commons acquired the right to
elect its own speaker. The lords who helped the usurpation felt
they should share the natural power of the kingship. The council
became the instrument of the Lords. Also, the Commons gained power
compared to the nobility because many nobles had died in war. The
consent of the Commons to legislation became so usual that the
justices declared that it was necessary. The Commons began to see
itself as representative of the entire commons of the realm
instead of just their own counties. Its members had the freedom to
consider and debate every matter of public interest, foreign or
domestic, except for church matters. The Commons, the poorest of
the three estates, established an exclusive right to originate all
money grants to the king in 1407. The Speaker of the Commons
announced its money grant to the king only on the last day of the
parliamentary session, after the answers to its petitions had been
declared, and after the Lords had agreed to the money grant. It
tied its grants by rule rather than just practice to certain
appropriations. For instance, tunnage and poundage were
appropriated for naval defenses. Wool customs went to the
maintenance of Calais, a port on the continent, and defense of the
nation. It also put the petitions in statutory form, called
"bills", to be enacted after consideration and amendment by all
without alteration. Each house had a right to deliberate in
privacy. In the Commons, members spoke in the order in which they
stood up bareheaded. Any member of Parliament or either house or
the king could initiate a bill. Both houses had the power to amend
or reject a bill. There were conferences between select committees
of both houses to settle their differences. The Commons required
the appointment of auditors to audit the King's accounts to ensure
past grants had been spent according to their purpose. It forced
the King's council appointees to be approved by Parliament and to
be paid salaries. About 1430, kings' councilors were required to
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account