Our Legal Heritage, King AEthelbert, 596 to King George III, 1775Reilly, S. A.
History
Our Legal Heritage, King AEthelbert, 596 to King George III, 1775
Reilly, S. A.
Law -- England -- History
At the end of this period was the reign of King John, a short man.
After his mother Eleanor's death in 1204, John ruled without her
influence. He had no conscience and his oaths were no good. He
trusted and was trusted by no one. He had a huge appetite for
money. He imposed 2,000 pounds [3,000 marks] on London for
confirmation of its charter. He imposed levies on the capital
value of all personal and moveable goods. It began the occasional
subsidies called "tenths and fifteenths" from all people on
incomes from movables: one-tenth from boroughs and royal demesne
land, and one-fifteenth elsewhere. He sold the wardships of minors
and the marriages of heiresses to the highest bidder, no matter
how base. He appointed unprincipled men to be both sheriff and
justice, enabling them to blackmail property holders with
vexatious writs and false accusations. Writs were withheld or sold
at exorbitant prices. Crushing penalties were imposed to increase
the profits of justice. He asserted over fowls of the air the same
exclusive right as over beasts of the forest. The story of Robin
Hood portrays John's attempt to gain the crown prematurely while
Richard was on the Crusades to recover Jerusalem for Christendom.
(In 1198, the bishop barons had refused to pay for a campaign of
Richard's war in Normandy arguing that military service was only
due within the kingdom of England. When Richard was captured,
every person in the realm was required to pay a part of his ransom
of 100,000 pounds, which was double the whole revenue of the
crown. Aids, tallages, and carucage were imposed. The heaviest
impost was one-fourth of revenue or of goods from every person.)
In 1213, strong northern barons refused a royal demand for service
in France or scutage, arguing that the amount was not within
custom or otherwise justified. John had private and public
enemies. No one trusted him and he trusted no one. His heavy
handed and arbitrary rule quickly alienated all sectors of the
population: other barons, bishops, London, and the commons. They
joined the barons to pressure him to sign the Magna Carta
correcting his abuses. For instance, since John had extracted many
heavy fines from barons by personally adjudging them blameworthy
in disputes with others, the barons wanted judgment by their peers
under the established law of the courts. In arms, the barons
forced John to sign the Magna Carta correcting his abuses.
- The Law -
No one, including the lord of a manor, may take land from anyone
else, for instance, by the customary process of distress, without
a judgment from the Royal Court. This did not apply to London,
where a landlord leasing or renting land could take distress in
his fee.
No one, including the lord of a manor, shall deprive an heir of
the land possessed by his father, i.e. his birthright.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account