Our Legal Heritage, King AEthelbert, 596 to King George III, 1775Reilly, S. A.
History
Our Legal Heritage, King AEthelbert, 596 to King George III, 1775
Reilly, S. A.
Law -- England -- History
11. Wulward of Wadebridge was burgled. And Odo Hay, Lawrence
Smith, Osbert Mediciner, and Benet his son, William Miller,
Robert of Frokemere, and Maud his sister, are suspected of
the burglary by the jurors of the hundred and by the four
nearest townships, which are sworn. Let the males purge
themselves by water under the Assize, and Maud by ordeal of
iron. Roger Morand fled for that burglary, and he was living
in Bodmin, [which town is] therefore in mercy.
12. Robert, Godfrey's son, appeals Philip, William's son,
for that he came on the land of [Robert's] lord Richard
Fortescue, and wickedly and in the king's peace and in
robbery took eight oxen and a mantle, cape, and sword, and
carried them off; and this he offers to prove against him by
his body under award of the court. And Philip comes and
defends all of it word by word. It is considered that the
appeal is null, for the oxen were not Robert's, but
Richard's. The jurors being asked, say that [Philip] did no
robbery to [Richard]. So Richard Fortescue is in mercy for a
false appeal, and let Philip be quit.
13. Peter Burel appeals Anketil of Wingely, for that he
wickedly in the king's peace assaulted him in the field
where he was pasturing his oxen, and beat him, and gave him
four wounds in the head, and in robbery took from him an ax
and a sword; and this he offers to prove against him; but he
shows no wound. And Anketil defends. And the county records
that [Peter] first appealed Roger of Tregadec of the same
robbery and of the same wounds. Therefore it is considered
that the appeal is null, and let Peter be in mercy for a
false appeal. His amercement, a half-mark; pledge for it,
Ralph Giffard.
14. The jurors are in mercy for a silly presentment, for
they presented an appeal which was made in the hundred
[court] and which was not presented in the county [court].
15. Lucy of Morwinstow appeals Robert de Scaccis and Roland
of Kellio and Peter of Lancarf of robbing her of twenty
shillings and eight pence, and of a cloak, price a
half-mark. And it is testified by the jurors that they did
not rob her, and that she is a hireling, and that a man lay
with her in a garden, and the boys hooted her, so that she
left her cloak, and the boys took it and pawned it for two
gallons of wine. It is considered that Robert do give her
three pence in respect of the wine and do go quit. And
Roland and Peter neither come nor essoin [present an excuse
for nonappearance] themselves. And their pledges were
Nicholas brother of Alfred of Bodmin and Herbert Reeve of
Bodmin, who are therefore in mercy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account