Our Legal Heritage, King AEthelbert, 596 to King George III, 1775Reilly, S. A.
History
Our Legal Heritage, King AEthelbert, 596 to King George III, 1775
Reilly, S. A.
Law -- England -- History
For water, most communities depended on rivers that ran near by
or on public wells that were dug to reach the water underground.
Some towns had water public water supply systems. Fresh water was
brought into the town from a spring or pond above the town by wood
or lead pipes or open conduits. Sometimes tree trunks were hollowed
out and tapered at the ends to fit into the funnel-shaped end of
another. But they leaked a lot. In London, a conduit piped water
underground to a lead tank, from which it was delivered to the
public by means of pipes and brass taps in the stone framework.
This was London's chief water supply. Water carriers carried water
in wooden devices on their backs to houses.
The paving and proper drainage of the streets became a town
concern. Building contracts began specifying the provision of
adequate cesspits for the privies at town houses, whether the
latrines were built into the house or as an outhouse. Also, in the
better houses, there grew a practice of carting human and animal
fecal matter at night to dung heaps outside the city walls. There
was one public latrine in each ward and about twelve dung carts
for the whole city. Country manor houses had latrines on the
ground floor and/or the basement level. Stairwells between floors
had narrow and winding steps.
In London, the Goldsmiths, Merchant Taylors [Tailors], Skinners,
and Girdlers bought royal charters, which recognized their power
of self-government as a company and their power to enforce their
standards, perhaps throughout the country. The Goldsmiths, the
Mercers, and the Saddlers became the first guilds to receive, in
1394-5, charters of incorporation, which gave them perpetual
existence. As such they could hold land in "mortmain" [dead hand],
thus depriving the king of rights that came to him on the death of
a tenant-in-chief. They were authorized to bestow livery on their
members and were called Livery Companies. The liverymen [freemen]
of the trading companies elected London's representatives to
Parliament.
In all towns, the organization of craft associations spread
rapidly downwards through the trades and sought self-government.
Craft guilds were gaining much power relative to the old merchant
guilds in governing the towns. The greater crafts such as the
fishmongers, skinners, and the corders (made rope, canvas, and
pitch) organized and ultimately were recognized by town
authorities as self-governing craft guilds. The building trade
guilds such as the tilers, carpenters, masons, and joiners, became
important. Masons were still itinerant, going to sites of
churches, public buildings, or commanded by the king to work on
castles. The guild was not necessarily associated with a specific
product. For instance, a saddle and bridle were the result of work
of four crafts: joiner (woodworker), painter, saddler (leather),
and lorimer (metal trappings).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account