Our Legal Heritage: King AEthelbert - King George III, 600 A.D. - 1776Reilly, S. A.
History
Our Legal Heritage: King AEthelbert - King George III, 600 A.D. - 1776
Reilly, S. A.
Law -- England -- History
Men in London had begun weaving cloth, which formerly had been
done by women. Some of the cloth was exported. The weavers guild of
London received a charter by the King in 1155, the first granted to any
London craft: "Know that I have conceded to the Weavers of London to
hold their guild in London with all the liberties and customs which
they had in the time of King Henry [I], my grandfather; and that none
may intermeddle with the craft within the city, nor in Southwark, nor
in other places pertaining to London except through them and except he
be in their guild, otherwise than was accustomed to be done in the time
of King Henry, my grandfather ...So that each year they render thence
to me two marks of gold at the feast of St. Michael. And I forbid that
any shall do injury or contumely to them on this account under penalty
of 10 pounds [200s.]. Witness T[homas], Chancellor, and Warinus, son of
Gerard, Chamberlain, at Winchester." The liberties obtained were: 1)
The weavers may elect bailiffs to supervise the work of the craft, to
punish defaulters, and to collect the ferm [amount owed to the King].
The bailiffs were chosen from year to year and swore before the mayor
of London to do and keep their office well and truly. 2) The bailiffs
may hold court from week to week on pleas of debt, agreements,
covenants [promises for certain performance], and minor trespasses. 3)
If any of the guild members are sued in any other court on any of the
above pleas, the guild may challenge that plea to bring it to the guild
court. 4) If any member is behind in his share of the payment to the
King, the bailiffs may distrain his loom until he has paid this.
The weavers' guild punished members who used bad thread in their
weaving or did defective weaving by showing the default to the mayor,
with opportunity for the workman to make entreaty, and the mayor and
twelve members of the guild then made a verdict of amercement of 1/2
mark and the workman of the cloth was also punished by the guild
bailiffs according to guild custom.The weavers' guild tradition of
brotherliness among members meant that injury to a fellow weaver
incurred a severe penalty. If a weaver stole or eloigned [removed them
to a distance where they were unreachable] any other weaver's goods
falsely and maliciously, then he was dismissed from the guild and his
loom was taken by the guild to fulfill his portion of the annual
payment to the King. The weavers were allowed to buy and to sell in
London freely and quietly. They had all the rights of other freemen of
the city.
Paying an annual payment freed the weavers from liability to
inconsequent royal fines. Failure to make this payment promptly might
have led to loss of the right, hence the rigorous penalty of distraint
upon the looms of individual weavers who fell into arrears.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account