Our Legal Heritage: King AEthelbert - King George III, 600 A.D. - 1776Reilly, S. A.
History
Our Legal Heritage: King AEthelbert - King George III, 600 A.D. - 1776
Reilly, S. A.
Law -- England -- History
The Conquerer was a stern and fierce man and ruled as an
autocrat by terror. Whenever the people revolted or resisted his
mandates, he seized their lands or destroyed the crops and laid waste
the countryside and so that they starved to death. This example
pacified others. His rule was strong, resolute, wise, and wary. He was
not arbitrary or oppressive. The Conquerer had a strict system of
policing the nation. Instead of the Anglo-Saxon self-government
throughout the districts and hundreds of resident authorities in local
courts, he aimed at substituting for it the absolute rule of the barons
under military rule so favorable to the centralizing power of the
Crown. He used secret police and spies and the terrorism this system
involved. This especially curbed the minor barons and preserved the
public peace.
The English people, who outnumbered the Normans by 300 to 1,
were disarmed. Curfew bells were rung at 7:00 PM when everyone had to
remain in their own dwellings on pain of death and all fires and
candles were to be put out. This prevented any nightly gatherings,
assassinations, or seditions. Order was brought to the kingdom so that
no man dare kill another, no matter how great the injury he had
received. The Conquerer extended the King's peace on the highways, i.e.
roads on high ground, to include the whole nation. Any individual of
any rank could travel from end to end of the land unharmed. Before,
prudent travelers would travel only in groups of twenty.
The barons subjugated the English who were on their newly
acquired land. There began a hierarchy of seisin of land so that there
could be no land without its lord. Also, every lord had a superior lord
with the king as the overlord or supreme landlord. One piece of land
may be held by several tenures. For instance, A, holding by barons'
service of the King, may enfeoff B, a church, to hold of him on the
terms of praying for the souls of his ancestors, and B may enfeoff a
freeman C to hold of the church by giving it a certain percentage of
his crops every year. There were about 200 barons who held land
directly of the King. Other fighting men were the knights, who were
tenants or subtenants of a baron. Knighthood began as a reward for
valor on the field of battle by the king or a noble. The value of a
knight's fee was 400s. [20 pounds] per year. Altogether there were
about 5000 fighting men holding land.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account