Our Legal Heritage: King AEthelbert - King George III, 600 A.D. - 1776: June 2011 (Sixth) EditionReilly, S. A.
History
Our Legal Heritage: King AEthelbert - King George III, 600 A.D. - 1776: June 2011 (Sixth) Edition
Reilly, S. A.
Law -- England -- History
Men in London had begun weaving cloth, which formerly had been done by
women. Some of the cloth was exported. The weavers guild of London
received a charter by the King in 1155, the first granted to any London
craft: "Know that I have conceded to the Weavers of London to hold their
guild in London with all the liberties and customs which they had in the
time of King Henry [I], my grandfather; and that none may intermeddle
with the craft within the city, nor in Southwark, nor in other places
pertaining to London except through them and except he be in their
guild, otherwise than was accustomed to be done in the time of King
Henry, my grandfather ...So that each year they render thence to me two
marks [26s.8d.] of gold at the feast of St. Michael. And I forbid that
any shall do injury or contumely to them on this account under penalty
of 10 pounds [200s.]. Witness T[homas], Chancellor, and Warinus, son of
Gerard, Chamberlain, at Winchester." The liberties obtained were: 1) The
weavers may elect bailiffs to supervise the work of the craft, to punish
defaulters, and to collect the ferm [amount owed to the King]. The
bailiffs were chosen from year to year and swore before the mayor of
London to do and keep their office well and truly. 2) The bailiffs may
hold court from week to week on pleas of debt, agreements, covenants
[promises for certain performance], and minor trespasses. 3) If any of
the guild members are sued in any other court on any of the above pleas,
the guild may challenge that plea to bring it to the guild court. 4) If
any member is behind in his share of the payment to the King, the
bailiffs may distrain his loom until he has paid this.
The weavers' guild punished members who used bad thread in their weaving
or did defective weaving by showing the default to the mayor, with
opportunity for the workman to make entreaty, and the mayor and twelve
members of the guild then made a verdict of amercement of 1/2 mark
[6s.8d.] and the workman of the cloth was also punished by the guild
bailiffs according to guild custom.The weavers' guild tradition of
brotherliness among members meant that injury to a fellow weaver
incurred a severe penalty. If a weaver stole or eloigned [removed them
to a distance where they were unreachable] any other weaver's goods
falsely and maliciously, then he was dismissed from the guild and his
loom was taken by the guild to fulfill his portion of the annual payment
to the King. The weavers were allowed to buy and to sell in London
freely and quietly. They had all the rights of other freemen of the
city.
Paying an annual payment freed the weavers from liability to
inconsequent royal fines. Failure to make this payment promptly might
have led to loss of the right, hence the rigorous penalty of distraint
upon the looms of individual weavers who fell into arrears.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account