Aeronautics -- Flights; Arctic regions; North Pole
As the expense of using airships was prohibitive, we could only
consider the employment of flying-machines. The choice of type depended
upon the idea we could form of the landing conditions among the ice.
The highest authority in the “world of polar-exploration,” and many
others who had hunted and fished Greenland’s east coast for many years,
all contended that there would be many suitable landing places on the
numerous big flat ice-floes, and also that we should find water-lanes
where the seaplanes could land. Some voices were raised against these
contentions but as they were only “voices” we didn’t lay much weight
on their opinion, though, as was proved later, these latter were
right,--but that is a different matter. We regarded it at that time
as certain that we should find plenty of big-enough landing places.
Accordingly we based our plans, on making an expedition which could
land to carry out observations and which would be of considerably
more value than an exploration expedition which would only fly over
the ice. An expedition thus equipped would be safer, as a forced
landing might have to be made at any time. We decided therefore to
use two machines, which would allow the expedition to continue with
one plane if the other had to make a forced landing on account of
irreparable engine trouble. In a forced landing, too, the machine
might be damaged, as there would not be the same opportunity to find
a suitable landing-place, as in the case of a voluntary landing. It
is also certain that it would double the chances of reaching the goal
ahead to set off with two machines rather than with only one,--always,
of course, banking on the probability of good opportunities for landing
being found.
On the other hand, if such opportunities for landing did not offer,
the use of two machines would halve the chances of success, as the
risk of engine trouble where two are concerned is naturally double
what it would be if only one machine were employed. The arrangements,
therefore, were, that both seaplanes’ crews should keep together.
When we made our forced landing on the ice we were convinced that
there were no suitable landing places to be found up there, and in
consequence we decided that we would only use one seaplane for the
homeward flight. We spent some days at first getting both machines
ready for a start, because starting conditions were _so_ difficult,
that it was an advantage to hold one machine in reserve in case the
other should get damaged in attempting to get away; but we discovered
that it would take the six of us to tackle the work in each case, so we
chose the machine which was in the best condition and therefore safest
for the homeward flight.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account