Our Presidents and how we make themMcClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
History
Our Presidents and how we make them
McClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
Presidents -- United States -- Election
_Resolved_, That all who revere the Constitution and the Union
must look with alarm at the parties in the field in the present
Presidential campaign—one claiming only to represent sixteen Northern
States, and the other appealing mainly to the passions and prejudices
of the Southern States; that the success of either faction must add
fuel to the flame which now threatens to wrap our dearest interests in
a common ruin.
_Resolved_, That the only remedy for an evil so appalling is to
support a candidate pledged to neither of the geographical sections
now arrayed in political antagonism, but holding both in a just and
equal regard. We congratulate the friends of the Union that such a
candidate exists in Millard Fillmore.
_Resolved_, That, without adopting or referring to the peculiar
doctrines of the party which has already selected Mr. Fillmore as a
candidate, we look to him as a well-tried and faithful friend of the
Constitution and the Union, eminent alike for his wisdom and firmness;
for his justice and moderation in our foreign relations; for his
calm and pacific temperament, so well becoming the head of a great
nation; for his devotion to the Constitution in its true spirit; his
inflexibility in executing the laws; but, beyond all these attributes,
in possessing the one transcendant merit of being a representative
of neither of the two sectional parties now struggling for political
supremacy.
_Resolved_, That, in the present exigency of political affairs,
we are not called upon to discuss the subordinate questions of
administration in the exercising of the constitutional powers of
the Government. It is enough to know that civil war is raging, and
that the Union is imperilled; and we proclaim the conviction that the
restoration of Mr. Fillmore to the Presidency will furnish the best if
not the only means of restoring peace.
The campaign of 1856 was one of the most desperately fought conflicts
in the history of American politics. In some of the Northern States,
and particularly in Pennsylvania, that had to be carried against
Buchanan in October to give promise of his defeat, the American party,
or the supporters of Fillmore and Donelson, were nearly or quite
as strong as the distinctive Republicans. Both were opposed to the
election of Buchanan, but they were wide apart not only on the slavery
issue, but on the questions of citizenship and religious proscription.
As the contest warmed up the necessity for some sort of union between
these elements was accepted on both sides, and in Pennsylvania,
Illinois, Indiana, and some other States the Americans, Republicans,
and old Whigs united on State tickets. Illinois, while it gave its
electoral vote to Buchanan, elected Colonel Bissell, an antislavery and
anti-Buchanan Democrat, Governor, and in Pennsylvania the Democratic
ticket was successful in October only by a very small majority.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account