Our Presidents and how we make themMcClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
History
Our Presidents and how we make them
McClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
Presidents -- United States -- Election
Pennsylvania was the pivotal State in the contest, and Colonel Forney
was chairman of the Democratic State Committee. He was thoroughly
familiar with the political situation, and greatly impaired his health
by his exhaustive efforts to save Buchanan in his home State. His
relations with Buchanan were of the closest and most confidential
nature, and each implicitly trusted the other. Buchanan knew Forney’s
ability in the management of a great political battle, and there was
no concealment between them as to the reward Forney should receive if
Buchanan succeeded. Forney’s ambition was to continue in journalism,
and it was not only understood, but the assurance voluntarily given
to Forney by Buchanan, that if Buchanan became President, Forney
should conduct the national organ in Washington and receive the Senate
printing. What was then known as the Senate printing was an abuse that
had grown up from small to large proportions until it became a fortune
to any man who received it during the period of an administration.
Gales and Seaton, of the _National Intelligencer_, had enjoyed it for
many years, and when Democratic administrations became more distinctly
partisan the favoritism was continued and the profits magnified. It was
deemed a necessity for each administration to have an organ, and it
was accepted in those days as the Democratic oracle of the nation. By
making Forney the editor of the administration organ at Washington with
the Senate printing, his highest ambition in his journalistic career
would have been gratified, with ample fortune added. So intimate were
Buchanan and Forney, that Forney’s family spent part of the summer at
Wheatland, where Forney would occasionally tarry for a day’s rest and
to consult with his chief.
Both parties were very confident of carrying the State in October, but
Forney outgeneralled the leaders of the Union ticket by his masterful
manipulation of Philadelphia, and the Buchanan State ticket was
successful in October by 3500 majority. Had the Buchanan State ticket
been defeated, Buchanan’s defeat for President would have been clearly
foreshadowed, as it would doubtless have made a successful union on the
electoral tickets in New Jersey, Indiana, and Illinois, as had already
been done in Pennsylvania. Notwithstanding the loss of Pennsylvania in
October, the friends of Fremont and Fillmore made desperate efforts
to carry the State in November, and so well did they fight their
battle that Buchanan’s majority in the State over the combined vote of
Fremont and Fillmore was only 1025. The Fremont and Fillmore people
believed that they had been defrauded out of the October election in
Pennsylvania, and Forney was denounced with extreme bitterness that had
lost none of its intensity in the Senatorial fight of 1857, when the
resentments of the opposition made Forney’s defeat for Senator possible
in a Democratic Legislature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account