Our Presidents and how we make themMcClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
History
Our Presidents and how we make them
McClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
Presidents -- United States -- Election
When Fremont made his brilliant campaign of 1856 and narrowly escaped
election to the Presidency, it was generally accepted by all the
varied phases of politics opposed to radical Republicanism that the
Republican movement was like a bee—biggest at its birth—and that it
never could win a national victory; but all the chief events affecting
the political sentiment of the country from 1856 until 1860 tended to
strengthen Republican sentiment and to alienate a large portion of the
intelligent elements of Democracy. The significant elections of 1858
and 1859, with the Kansas-Nebraska war convulsing the country from
centre to circumference, steadily strengthened Republican lines, and
when the leaders of the party came to face the great battle of 1860
they well understood that success was within their reach, and never did
a party exhibit greater sagacity in leadership than was displayed in
the convention that nominated Lincoln.
William H. Seward was the confessed Republican leader of the nation.
He was admittedly its ablest champion and was among its earliest
supporters. He had been long in the Senate, and was the peer of any
in the discussion of all the grave questions which then agitated our
national Legislature. He was not only the ablest of his party, but
he was one of the most exemplary and courteous of men. Two-thirds of
all the delegates elected to that convention were friends of Seward
and expected to vote for him, and his nomination would have been
inevitable on the 1st ballot had not the convention been restrained
by considerations of expediency which were most reluctantly accepted.
Lincoln’s own delegation from Illinois embraced one-third of positive
Seward men. They were instructed for Lincoln without hope of his
nomination at the time, and most of them expected to perform a mere
perfunctory duty by voting for him on one or more ballots.
[Illustration: ABRAHAM LINCOLN]
Horace Greeley had sounded the first note of warning against the
nomination of Seward, and his paper, the New York _Tribune_, was then
the most influential journal ever published in this country. It was the
Republican Bible, and its weekly edition was more read in the West than
all other Eastern papers combined. He startled the party by a series of
dignified and masterly articles in favor of Edward Bates, of Missouri,
for President, on the ground that Seward was not available, and that
a man of the great ability and conservative attitude of Bates alone
could win in that contest. But though the conservative element of the
opposition to the Democracy was not enthusiastic for Seward and his
“irrepressible conflict,” the true reason of Seward’s defeat was not
presented either by Mr. Greeley or by any public discussion before the
meeting of the convention.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account