Our Presidents and how we make themMcClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
History
Our Presidents and how we make them
McClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
Presidents -- United States -- Election
The Presidential contest of 1876 brought into the national political
arena the strongest personality developed by the Republican party, with
the single exception of Abraham Lincoln. James G. Blaine was admittedly
the Henry Clay of the Republican party, and both were equally idolized
and equally fated. The Republican party had men of profounder
intellect than Blaine, but no one who so completed the circle of all
the qualities of a popular leader, including masterly ability as a
disputant. Like Clay, he was idolized by his friends and most bitterly
defamed by his foes, and both were twice defeated by their party for
Presidential nominations when the party was successful, and both
nominated only to suffer defeat.
With an intimate knowledge of the public men of the last half century,
I regard Blaine as the most magnetic man I have ever met. His greeting
to friend and stranger was always generous without gush, and at once
brought all who had any communication with him into apparently the
closest relations. He remembered names of the humblest and most distant
of his acquaintances; always knew something of their communities and
their interests. It was not the art of a demagogue, but the natural
impulse of a big-hearted, big-brained enthusiast, and Blaine was an
enthusiast in everything that enlisted his interest. When, in addition
to these charming personal qualities, he possessed every attribute
of a great popular orator, it is not difficult to understand why
Blaine became the favorite of the people. Like all who have reached
any measure of distinction in that line, he had bitter and malignant
foes, and he could well have said of himself, as Clay once did when
overcome by an exhibition of the generosity of his friends, who had
paid a note that greatly embarrassed him: “Never had man such friends
and such enemies as Henry Clay.” The chief difference between Clay and
Blaine was in the fact that the masses did not know Clay from personal
contact, while the masses well knew Blaine, and saw him as he was
in his every-day life as well as in his great achievements in politics
and statesmanship. In another respect Blaine differed widely from Clay.
Blaine was a fatalist, and from 1876, when he was first defeated for
the Republican nomination for President in Cincinnati, until his name
was last presented to the Republican National Convention in 1892, he
was oppressed, profoundly oppressed, with the belief that he never
could be President; while Clay hoped to realize the great dream of his
life, and confidently expected his election to the Presidency until his
final defeat in the Philadelphia convention of 1848.
[Illustration: RUTHERFORD B. HAYES]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account