Our Presidents and how we make themMcClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
History
Our Presidents and how we make them
McClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
Presidents -- United States -- Election
33d │ 1 │ 309 │ 276 │ 110 │ 44 │ 11 │ 4 │ ―― │ ―― │ ―― │ ―― │ ―― │ ―― │ ―― │ 755 │ 378
34th │ 17 │ 312 │ 275 │ 107 │ 30 │ 11 │ 4 │ ―― │ ―― │ ―― │ ―― │ ―― │ ―― │ ―― │ 756 │ 379
35th │ 50 │ 313 │ 257 │ 99 │ 23 │ 11 │ 3 │ ―― │ ―― │ ―― │ ―― │ ―― │ ―― │ ―― │ 756 │ 379
36th │ 399 │ 306 │ 42 │ 3 │ 5 │ ―― │ ―― │ ―― │ ―― │ ―― │ ―― │ ―― │ ―― │ ―― │ 755 │ 378
════════╧═════════╧═════════╧════════╧════════╧══════════╧═════════╧═══════╧══════════╧═════════╧═════════╧══════════╧═════════╧═════════╧═════════╧══════╧════════════
While it was generally expected that the convention would eventually
stampede to Garfield, the movement was given vitality and form by
the Wisconsin delegation. The only name prominently discussed as a
compromise candidate in addition to that of Garfield was the name of
Senator Windom, of Minnesota, who had received the vote of his State
from the start. In a caucus of the delegation a small majority of the
Wisconsin delegation voted to prefer Garfield to Windom, and that
movement started the tide that gave the victory to Garfield. It is
quite possible that if Wisconsin had declared for Windom, instead of
Garfield, as it failed to do by only a very few votes, Windom might
have been made the candidate, as he occupied a very strong position in
the party, was free from factional alliances, and probably would have
been quite as strong a candidate with the people as Garfield. When
the Wisconsin delegation decided to break the deadlock by accepting
Garfield, it opened the door for the wearied anti-Grant gladiators to
find speedy and gratifying refuge. Grant’s column stood to him with
marvellous fidelity. He started with 304 votes, never fell below 302,
never rose above 313, and ended on the final ballot with 306. The
nomination of Garfield was made unanimous amidst the wildest enthusiasm.
Senator Conkling was in violent temper over the defeat of Grant, and
when he was asked to name a candidate for Vice-President he at first
petulantly refused to do so, but some of his more deliberate friends
suggested the name of Chester A. Arthur, who was in the delegation.
Arthur had acted as chairman during part of the balloting when Conkling
was absent, and his dignified and manly manner of announcing the vote
of his State contrasted very favorably with the offensive manner of
Conkling. Conkling assented to rather than dictated the nomination of
Arthur, and the 1st ballot for Vice-President was as follows:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account