Our Presidents and how we make themMcClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
History
Our Presidents and how we make them
McClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
Presidents -- United States -- Election
Blaine committed many serious blunders during the campaign of 1884.
He and Cleveland were both made the targets of flagrant scandals, and
when the Cleveland scandal was sent to Blaine in the early part of
the contest, instead of peremptorily forbidding its use as a campaign
factor, as would have been most wise, he sent it to his national
committee, and it was given publicity. The Blaine scandal was sent
to Cleveland early in the fight, and he at once gave notice to those
in charge of his campaign that any personal scandals against Blaine
should not have the sanction of the Democratic organization. Blaine
never would have committed such a mistake if he had been managing a
Presidential campaign for another, and had he been such responsible
manager, he never would have permitted a libel suit to be instituted
against a newspaper publisher for any scandal, however false and
malignant. He was a man of intense earnestness, and the intensity of
his interest in his own election for the Presidency unbalanced his
judgment and made him often the creature of impulse when he should have
been most dispassionate and philosophical. The scandals did not affect
a thousand votes out of the many millions cast for President, and
Blaine suffered vastly more than Cleveland, because he dignified the
scandal against himself by legal proceedings for defamation. The fact
that he voluntarily discontinued the suit after the election is the
best evidence of the error committed against himself.
Charles A. Dana, then editor of the New York _Sun_, became estranged
from Mr. Cleveland the year before the Presidential election of 1884.
He had earnestly supported Cleveland for Governor in 1882, but when a
movement was made by Mr. Manning to organize the State for Cleveland
in 1884 Dana was implacable in his opposition. I met him several times
before Cleveland was nominated, and he always discussed the question
with an unusual degree of acrimony. He believed that Cleveland was not
available; that he was unworthy of the position, and that if nominated
he would be overwhelmingly defeated. He gave me no reason for his
changed relations with Cleveland, and I did not learn the true cause
until after Cleveland had been elected President.
Soon after Cleveland’s nomination I was spending a few days at
Saratoga, and was watching Dana’s paper with much interest, for he was
very much disgruntled. He did not at first declare himself aggressively
against Cleveland’s election, but one morning at Saratoga, in taking up
the Sun, I found one of Dana’s terrible deliverances against Cleveland,
that left no possible chance for a reconciliation. I telegraphed to
Mr. Dana and asked him to meet me at his office at three o’clock that
afternoon, and called there on my way home. Mr. Dana had gone too far
to recede, but I tried to temper his bitterness, as I thought it would
do great harm, not only to Cleveland, but to his own newspaper as well,
then one of the most prosperous in the country.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account