Our Presidents and how we make themMcClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
History
Our Presidents and how we make them
McClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
Presidents -- United States -- Election
Mr. Dana gave no open sign of his disappointment, but some time after
Cleveland’s inauguration, when it became known that Dana felt grieved
at the Governor, some mutual friends intervened and proposed to
Cleveland that he should invite Dana to join with some acquaintances
at the Executive Mansion. To this Cleveland readily assented. Dana was
informed that Cleveland would tender such an invitation if it would
be accepted, and he promptly assented. Cleveland then became involved
in the pressing duties of the Legislature, and allowed the session
to close without extending the promised and expected invitation to
Dana. Mr. Cleveland told me that he was entirely to blame for neglect
in both instances, as Dana would doubtless have been satisfied if he
had courteously informed him of his convictions which required him to
appoint another for Adjutant-General; and he had no excuse to offer but
that of neglect for not inviting Dana to dinner.
Dana naturally assumed that Cleveland had given him deliberate affront,
and Cleveland could make no satisfactory explanation. As Governor and
as President he was first of all devoted to his official duties, which
he discharged with rare fidelity, and he gave little time even to the
common courtesies which most Governors and Presidents would recognize
as justly belonging to their friends. Efforts were made to conciliate
Dana, but he never would discuss the question, and he sacrificed half
the circulation of his paper in the campaign of 1884 in his battle
against Cleveland. When Cleveland’s election was announced, and the
Republicans were disposed to dispute the vote of New York, Dana came
out boldly and declared that Cleveland was elected and that no violent
measures should be tolerated to deprive him of the honor conferred upon
him by the people.
It is quite possible that Dana got even with Cleveland in 1888. His
paper gave a nominal support to Cleveland, but did more damage to the
Cleveland cause than any other newspaper in the country by subtle
and persistent attacks upon the administration and the party, though
never exhibiting on the surface a trace of personal hostility to
the President. The _Sun_ was then the organ of Tammany, and Tammany
certainly defeated Cleveland in 1888 by giving the State to Harrison,
when Hill, the Democratic candidate for Governor on the same ticket,
was elected by nearly 20,000. It is not a strained conclusion that Dana
defeated Cleveland’s re-election in 1888. The estrangement between Dana
and Cleveland continued, as they never met or had any intercourse.
Blaine’s nomination was possible in 1888 when Harrison was made the
candidate, but after hesitating for three days, during which time he
freely conferred by cable with his friends, as he was then in Europe,
he finally decided to decline.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account