Our Presidents and how we make themMcClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
History
Our Presidents and how we make them
McClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
Presidents -- United States -- Election
John Tyler, who had been one of the most ardent of the Clay Whigs, was
confidently expected to maintain the policy of Harrison. The public
measures advocated by Clay were well understood by all, and it was
reasonable to assume that Tyler, who had been long one of his most
earnest supporters, was in entire accord with his chief. A special
session of Congress was summoned to meet on the 31st of May, 1841, and
the Whigs expected to carry all their political theories into practical
effect by national statutes at an early day. To the surprise of some of
the leaders, President Tyler exhibited some measure of unsoundness on
the question of the United States Bank, but after repeated conferences
with him they believed that they could frame a bill that would entirely
meet his views and command his approval. The bill was passed by a
decided majority in both branches, and the Whigs were dumbfounded by a
prompt veto from the President. Other conferences followed, and a new
bill was framed, to which the President assented, and although it was
passed without amendment, another veto followed. The first veto of the
Bank bill brought out very angry criticisms from a number of the Whig
leaders, and one of the most earnest and aggressive of Tyler’s critics
was John Minor Botts, then a Whig Congressman from Virginia, and one of
the most brilliant and erratic of the Whig leaders of his day. It was
believed that the irritation of the President, caused by the criticisms
of leading Whigs, finally decided the President to veto the second Bank
bill.
Thus the Whigs were defeated in one of the cardinal measures of
their faith. The Whig Senators and Representatives met in caucus and
published an address to the country, in which it was declared that
“those who brought the President into power can no longer in any manner
or degree be justly held responsible or blamed for the administration
of the Executive branch of the Government.” Thus the Whig power was
broken and demoralized at the very threshold of its existence, and
the chasm between the Whig Senate and House, on the one side, and the
President, on the other, steadily widened and deepened until it was
admittedly impassable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account