Our Presidents and how we make themMcClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
History
Our Presidents and how we make them
McClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
Presidents -- United States -- Election
Mr. Clay enjoyed a much larger measure of personal popularity than any
other man in the nation, and he was universally accepted as the most
gifted political orator of his day. He was to the Whigs of that time
what Blaine was to the Republicans during his several unsuccessful
battles for the Presidency. It is a notable fact in political history
that no pre-eminent political orator ever succeeded in reaching the
Presidency. Garfield was the nearest approach to it, but he was a
contemporary of Blaine, and Blaine far outstripped him either on the
hustings or in parliamentary debate. Clay had entered both the House
and Senate when little more than eligible by age, and he was admittedly
the most accomplished presiding officer the House ever had. He was the
Commoner of the war of 1812, and rendered most conspicuous service to
his country. His speeches in the House did more than the persuasion of
any other dozen men to force the young Republic into a second contest
with England on the right of search on the high seas. He was always
strong in argument, was often impassioned and superbly eloquent, and
in every great emergency of the country during the first half of the
present century he was the pacificator. President Madison was most
reluctant to declare war against England, and he yielded to it only
when it became a supreme necessity to obey the general demand of the
country for an appeal to arms.
When Clay was nominated for President in 1844, it was generally
believed that he would have an easy victory over Van Buren, and when
Polk, of Tennessee, was made the compromise candidate against him,
the Whigs at first believed that the nomination of a comparatively
obscure man against the great chieftain of the Whigs would give them
a walk-over. The campaign had made little progress, however, until
the Whigs discovered that the Democrats were going to be thoroughly
united on Polk, and that he was probably the strongest candidate who
could have been nominated against Clay. His chief strength was in his
negative qualities. He had not been involved in any of the conflicts
of ambition among the Democratic leaders. He was regarded as the
favorite of Jackson, and while his nomination had been made without
any previous discussion or suggestion of his claims to the Presidency,
he had filled high State and national positions with credit, and he
could not be accused of incompetency. I doubt indeed whether any other
Democrat could have been nominated by the Democratic convention to make
a successful battle against Clay.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account