Our Presidents and how we make themMcClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
History
Our Presidents and how we make them
McClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
Presidents -- United States -- Election
The Kentucky electors met at their Capitol on the day appointed for the
electoral colleges to cast their votes for President, and in sorrowing
devotion to their chief cast the vote of the State for Clay for
President. After their official duties had been performed a committee
was appointed to prepare an address to be delivered to Mr. Clay at
Ashland. All the members of the college, with many other citizens,
accompanied the committee, and Clay met them at his hospitable door to
hear the address delivered by Mr. Underwood, the chairman. Clay’s reply
was one of the most beautiful of his very many exquisite illustrations
of oratory. He said he would not “affect indifference to the personal
concern which I had in the political contest just terminated, but
unless I am greatly self-deceived, the principal attraction to me of
the office of President of the United States arose out of the cherished
hope that I might be an humble instrument, in the hands of Providence,
to accomplish public good,” and in conclusion he said: “I heartily
thank you, sir, for your friendly wishes for my happiness in the
retirement which henceforth best becomes me.” Thus closed the memorable
Polk-Clay contest of 1844.
THE TAYLOR-CASS-VAN BUREN CONTEST
1848
President Polk was not blessed with a tranquil administration. The
annexation of Texas had been approved by Tyler several days before Polk
was inaugurated as President, and that at once made strained relations
between this country and Mexico. It was an open secret then, and is
now a part of the undisputed history of the country, that the election
of Polk and the annexation of Texas were regarded by the friends of
slavery extension as most important achievements, and that period
dated the aggressive action of the South, first to extend and next to
nationalize slavery. The annexation of Texas brought in a Slave State
and two United States Senators, with the treaty right to add eight new
Senators by the subdivision of the State.
This met Calhoun’s complaint that the South could not maintain its
equilibrium in the Senate because of the growing West. The purposes of
the Southern extensionists, however, went far beyond the annexation of
Texas. They meant to have part of Mexico, peaceably if possible, by war
if necessary; and the war was deliberately planned and precipitated
upon Mexico by the action of the administration. The territory between
the Nueces and the Rio Grande rivers was claimed by both Texas and
Mexico, but Mexico had exercised uniform jurisdiction. Texas had never
served a writ or collected a dollar of revenue on the Rio Grande, and
the United States army of occupation, commanded by General Taylor,
had not gone south of the Nueces. There was much violent discussion
in Mexico over the annexation of Texas, whose independence Mexico
disputed, and threats of war were freely made.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account