Our Presidents and how we make themMcClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
History
Our Presidents and how we make them
McClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
Presidents -- United States -- Election
The Wilmot Proviso raised the slavery issue in the most direct form,
and it played an important part in the Presidential contest of 1848.
It was simply a repetition of the clause prohibiting slavery that was
put in the ordinance of 1787 by Thomas Jefferson, when the Northwestern
Territory was ceded by Virginia to the United States. It was a very
embarrassing issue to many Northern Democrats, and to a few Southern
Whigs who inclined to prevent slavery extension. General Cass, who was
made the candidate for President in 1848, originally declared himself
in favor of the Wilmot Proviso, but he learned a year later that no
man could maintain his fellowship with the Democratic party under the
Polk administration and support the prohibition of slavery in the
Territories.
When the discussion of candidates for the Presidential contest of 1848
became active, General Cass was addressed on the subject of slavery by
A. O. P. Nicholson, of Nashville, Tenn., in which he inquired of Cass
whether he was in favor of the acquisition of Mexican territory, and
what his views were as to the Wilmot Proviso. General Cass answered,
December 24, 1847, in which he declared himself in favor of the
acquisition of Mexican territory and against the Wilmot Proviso, on
which point he said: “I am strongly impressed with the opinion that a
great change has been going on in the public mind upon this subject, in
my own as well as others, and that doubts are resolving themselves into
convictions that the principle it involves should be kept out of the
national Legislature and left to the people of the Confederacy in their
respective local governments.” But for this declaration Cass would not
have been the Democratic candidate for President in 1848, and that
declaration also opened the door for the Van Buren bolt that defeated
Cass in the great ambition of his life.
In addition to the serious political complications which confronted
the Polk administration and threatened the defeat of the Democratic
party at its close, the Oregon dispute with England, that had been made
one of the chief features of the Polk campaign of 1844, was sensibly
adjusted by Secretary of State Buchanan, but in utter disregard of the
Democratic declarations and ostentatious professions of the campaign.
In that contest the Democrats from every stump declared that the
boundary line between Oregon and England must be “54° 40´, or fight”;
but when the issue became a question of statesmanship and diplomacy, a
treaty was made fixing 49° as the boundary, and thus confessing that
the claim of the Democrats in the campaign was made either in ignorance
or insincerity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account