"At sight it would appear that it [competition] has possessed certain
advantages. It is found that in Great Britain, the only European
country where different routes between the same important centers
exist to any great extent under separate management, the train service
is more complete than anywhere else _except France_ [the italics are
my own] and the passenger-fares are by no means particularly high. But
when we remember that Great Britain was the first country to develop
railways and so got a long start of the rest of the world, and that
the population of Great Britain for each unit of area is much greater
than that of any other big country--more than twice as great as that
of France, and half as great again as that of Germany--we see that
there are other causes to which these effects may be ascribed.
"No conditions of this kind, however, tend in any way to show that
competition, if attainable, is incapable of producing good results on
railways at the present time. Far from it; railways present so many
possibilities of improvement that if any really effective means could
be discovered of inducing their managers to make bold experiments, it
is more than likely that the best results would ensue. As has just
been remarked the facilities offered to passengers are certainly on
the whole greater in Great Britain than elsewhere, and in conjunction
with--probably in consequence of--this, it is found that the passenger
receipts per head of the population are approximately twice as large
as they are in France or Germany.
"On the face of it then there is a very good reason for supposing that
the receipts increase with the facilities offered. Now the two things
above all others that passengers may be expected to care for are
reduced third-class fares and increased speeds. If railway managers,
animated by some real spirit of competition, were to offer these
advantages, it is possible and even probable that travel would
increase so much that the railways, besides conferring a great boon on
their customers, would themselves secure large benefits.
"As regards the goods traffic, the definite elimination of all
competition would be likely to have the result of doing away with
several unsatisfactory features of this traffic. Even though there is
ostensibly no competition in rates between the different companies
serving the same points, there can be no doubt that the fear of losing
traffic has frequently induced railways to make concessions of various
kinds to traders, the results of which have been to give more or less
secret rebates to the traders in whose favor the concessions were
made."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account