Our Standard-Bearer; Or, The Life of General Uysses S. GrantOptic, Oliver
History
Our Standard-Bearer; Or, The Life of General Uysses S. Grant
Optic, Oliver
Generals -- United States -- Biography -- Juvenile literature; Grant, Ulysses S. (Ulysses Simpson), 1822-1885 -- Juvenile literature
It was evident that before Grant could be sent into obscurity, even
for a time, a searching investigation into the conduct of the culprit
was to be had. The president and the secretary of war were not
willing blindly to consign the hero of Fort Donelson to obloquy and
disgrace. Mr. Stanton only a few days before had thrillingly defined
the "organization of victory," as set forth in the words of Grant;
and he was not prepared to have the author of that electric sentence
shoved out of the line of attack. He insisted upon knowing what wicked
deeds Grant had done, and Halleck had permission only to "ascertain and
report." He did "ascertain;" but as only five days intervene between
the date of the order and that of his reply, it is not probable that he
found it necessary to push his inquiries to any great extent. He did
"report," as follows:--
"HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE MISSISSIPPI,}
ST. LOUIS, March 15, 1862.}
"BRIGADIER GENERAL L. THOMAS,
_Adjutant General of the Army, Washington_:
"In accordance with your instructions of the 10th inst., I
report that General Grant and several officers of high rank in
his command, immediately after the battle of Fort Donelson, went
to Nashville without my authority or knowledge. I am satisfied,
however, from investigation, that General Grant did this from good
intentions, and from a desire to subserve the public interests.
Not being advised of General Buell's movements, and learning that
General Buell had ordered Smith's division of his (Grant's) command
to go to Nashville, he deemed it his duty to go there in person.
During the absence of General Grant and a part of his general
officers, numerous irregularities are said to have occurred at Fort
Donelson. These were in violation of the orders issued by General
Grant before leaving, and probably, under the circumstances, were
unavoidable. General Grant has made the proper explanations, and
has been directed to resume his command in the field; as he acted
from a praiseworthy although mistaken zeal for the public service
in going to Nashville and leaving his command, I respectfully
recommend that no further notice be taken of it. There never has
been any want of military subordination on the part of General
Grant, and his failure to make returns of his forces has been
explained, as resulting partly from the failure of colonels of
regiments to report to him on their arrival, and partly from an
interruption of telegraphic communication. All these irregularities
have now been remedied.
H.W. HALLECK, _Major General_."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account