Out in the Forty-Five: Duncan Keith's VowHolt, Emily Sarah
General
Out in the Forty-Five: Duncan Keith's Vow
Holt, Emily Sarah
Christian life -- Juvenile fiction; Conduct of life -- Juvenile fiction; Jacobite Rebellion, 1745-1746 -- Juvenile fiction
My Aunt Kezia and Mr Raymond have taken wonderfully to one another.
Hatty said to her that she could not think how they got on when they
chanced on politics.
"Bless you, child, we never do!" said my Aunt Kezia. "We have got
something better to talk about. And why should two brothers quarrel
because one likes red heels to his shoes and the other admires black
ones?"
"Ah, if that were all, Aunt!" said I. "But how can you leave it there?
It seems to me not a matter for opinion, but a question of right. We
have to take sides; and we may choose the wrong one."
"I don't see that a woman need take any side unless she likes," quoth my
Aunt Kezia. "I can bake as tasty a pie, and put on as neat a patch,
whether I talk of Prince Charles or the Young Pretender. And patches
and pies are my business: the Prince isn't. I reckon the Lord will
manage to see that every one gets his rights, without Kezia Courtenay
running up to help Him."
"But somebody has it to do, Aunt."
"Let them do it, then. I'm glad I'm not somebody."
"But, Aunt Kezia, don't you want people to have their rights?"
"Depends on what their rights are, child. Some of us would be very
sadly off if we got them. I should not like my rights, I know."
"Ah, you mean your deserts, Aunt," said Hatty. "But rights are not just
the same thing, are they?"
"Let us look it in the face, girls, if you wish," saith my Aunt Kezia.
"I hate seeing folks by side-face. If you want to see anybody, or
understand anything, look right in its face. What are rights? They are
not always deserts,--you are right there, Hatty,--for none of us hath
any rights as regards God. Rights concern ourselves and our fellow-men.
I take it, every man hath a right to what he earns, and to what is
given him,--whether God or man gave it to him,--so long as he that gave
had the right over what he gave. Now, as to this question, it seems to
me all lies in a nut-shell. If King James be truly the son of the old
King (which I cannot doubt), then God gave him the crown of England, of
which no man can possibly have any right to deprive him. Only God can
do that. Then comes the next question, Has God done that? Time must
answer. Without a revelation from Heaven, we cannot find it out any
other way."
"But until we do find it out, where are we to stand?"
"Keep to your last orders till you get fresh ones. A servant will make
sad blunders who goes contrary to orders, just because he fancies that
his master may have changed his mind."
I see that for all practical purposes my Aunt Kezia agrees with Annas.
And indeed what they say sounds but reasonable.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account