The evolution of dogma is possible; why is it necessary? Simply
because the material of which it is composed is in a state of constant
flux and evolution.... We do not mean to say that everything in the
old formulas should be condemned. There are to be found in them many
great and excellent ideas which still retain their truth and power. We
simply say that there is nothing absolute in them, nothing that may be
imposed by authority on Christian thought. It is always with notions
borrowed from current science and philosophy that the Church constructs
her dogmas. But science and philosophy are continually evolving and
carrying dogma in their train. Everything changes, even our manner of
thinking. Why do certain things appear absurd or grotesque in the
imaginations of the past? Because we have lost the faculty for
comprehending them. It is as impossible for us to think in Greek as to
speak in Greek. Since the end of the Middle Ages two or three
intellectual revolutions have occurred which have profoundly separated
us from antiquity and changed the inner and the outer world in which we
live. It will suffice to recall them in a few words in order to deepen
our sense of the decadence of Graeco-Roman dogmatic Christianity, and of
the necessity incumbent upon us to reform and renovate it, if only we
are strong enough to answer to the call of God.
3. _The Crisis of Dogma_
The first of these revolutions was a religious one. Our specific
consciousness as Protestant Christians dates from the Reformation.
Now, the Evangelical Reformation of the sixteenth century was the
rupture of the tradition of the Church, of which the Dogmatics of the
great Councils was the framework and the centre. In breaking the
authority of the Church, the Reformers broke up the basis on which
those ancient dogmas had been built. In appealing to the Word of God
against traditional doctrines, they at least called in question the
Dogmatics of the Councils. After protesting against all the
infiltrations of pagan manners and superstitions into the morals of the
Church, into its organisation and its hierarchy into its worship and
its rites, why should they regard as sacrosanct the ancient philosophy
which had entered into the construction of its dogmas?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account