... The ego can only be conscious of itself and of its modifications.
That which does not touch it in any way remains unknown. Now, the
modifications of the ego may be reduced to two groups. The one comes
to it from without, representing the action of things upon it; these
are sensations. The other springs up within, representing the action
of the ego on things, its spontaneous energy, its volitions, and its
acts. Thence come the two constituent elements of every consciousness,
the distinction between object and subject, the ego and the non-ego,
thought and the object of thought. We call _objective_ every idea or
quality that it is possible to refer to the object alone, independently
of the action or disposition of the subject. We call _subjective_ all
knowledge implying identity of subject and object, all discipline
bearing on the rules of the spontaneous activity of the ego, since
without that activity the rules which should direct it would not exist.
In the first case we are conscious of a distinction and even of a
radical opposition between the object and the subject of knowledge; in
the second, we are conscious of their fundamental identity in this
sense, that the thinking and willing subject presents itself to itself
as an object of thought and study. In order that the two orders of
knowledge, engendered by this duality of origin, may be brought into
logical unity, it is necessary either that the subject should enter
into the object, that the ego should be absorbed by the non-ego, so
that the laws of the non-ego should become the laws of the ego--and
that would be materialism; or that the object should enter into the
subject so that the laws of the subject should become the law of
things--and that would be idealism. Outside these two systems, equally
violent and absolute, the two orders of knowledge are irreducible,
because in us the consciousness of the ego and the consciousness of the
world are at present in conflict. Morality is neither reconciled to
science, nor science to morality. In their _rapprochement_,
progressive to infinity, a hiatus always subsists.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account