Outlines of Ecclesiastical HistoryRoberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
Religion
Outlines of Ecclesiastical History
Roberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
Church history; Latter Day Saint churches -- History
28. Sabellian Theory.--On one side of this orthodox theory stood
the doctrine of Sabellius [Sa-bel-i-us], who held that there was but
one divine person in the Godhead, and that the Father, Son and Holy
Spirit were but different aspects of the same God, and that the Trinity
was one of names, merely, not of distinct persons.[89] The Logos, in hi
theory, is an attribute {171} of Deity rather than a person; and its
incarnation is reduced to an energy or inspiration of the Divine wisdom
which filled the soul and directed all the actions of the man Jesus.
29. The Arian Theory.--On the other side of the orthodox line
stood the theory of Arius [A-ri-us], who while he maintained a real
distinction in the persons of the Divine Trinity, taught that the
Son was created out of nothing by the will of the Father; and though
the longest astronomical periods would not measure the time of his
duration, yet there had been a time when he was not. Upon the Son
thus created the Father bestowed great glory, yet he shone only by a
reflected light, and governed the universe only in obedience to the
will of the Father; in other words, the Son was subordinate to the
Father, unequal as to eternity, power and glory.
30. The Nicene Council.--It was to still the rising commotion
which arose in the church through the violent discussion of these
several theories that the Emperor Constantine assembled the Council
of Nice [Nes]. A. D. 325. In that council the theories of Arius were
condemned and the orthodox creed stated thus:
We believe in one God, the Father, Almighty, the maker of all
things visible and invisible; and in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the
Son of God, begotten of the Father, only begotten, (that is) of
the substance of the Father; God of God, Light of Light; Very God
of Very God; begotten not made; of the same substance with the
Father, by whom all things were made, that are in heaven and that
are in earth: who for us men, and for our salvation, descended and
was incarnate, and became man; suffered and rose again the third
day, ascended into the heavens and will come to judge the living
and the dead, and in the Holy Spirit. But those who say there was a
time when he [the {172} Son] was not, and that he was not before he
was begotten, and that he was made out of nothing, or affirm that
he is of any other substance or essence, of that the Son of God
was created, and mutable, or changeable, the Catholic Church doth
pronounce accursed.[90]
31. Athanasius [Ath-a-na-shi-us], who was the most active
opponent of Arius, thus explains the Nicene doctrine, in what is
commonly known as the creed of Athanasius.[91]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account