Outpost in the Wilderness: Fort Wayne, 1706-1828Poinsatte, Charles R.
History
Outpost in the Wilderness: Fort Wayne, 1706-1828
Poinsatte, Charles R.
Fort Wayne (Ind.) -- History
The year 1825 found the village of Fort Wayne had developed to a town of
nearly one hundred and fifty people—that is to say of persons considered
more or less permanently settled. The town was in the pathway of many
who traveled by way of the rivers, passing chiefly to the southwest; so
there was a closer business and social connection with the busy eastern
centers than had prevailed during the earlier years.
In many respects the growth of Fort Wayne was typical of what was
happening elsewhere in the West. The Indian country, opened to the
whites by the treaties between 1795 and 1818, was being speedily
settled. The “New Purchase” acquired from the Miami and Potawatomie in
1818 was carved into twenty-two counties and a flood of settlers rushed
in to take up the choice locations. In 1829 it was estimated that a
hundred thousand people were living in the New Purchase. In 1820, but
four years a state, Indiana boasted a population of 147,178 people, and
the next census revealed the addition of 195,853. In 1826, the northern
third of Indiana was held by less than three thousand Indians while the
southern two-thirds was settled by one hundred times as many whites.
Within a short time pressure of the whites, who lusted for the rich land
north of the Wabash-Maumee line, led to an inexorable demand for Indian
removal.
Fort Wayne as a central point along this line of the Maumee and Wabash
river, and at the edge of the white civilization, while touching the
Indian country, held a unique and paradoxical position. The traders and
land speculators at Fort Wayne—the Ewings, Hamilton, Hanna, Barnett,
Hood, Comparet, Coquillard, and others—were making a handsome profit in
their dealings with the Indians. As long as the Indian agency remained
at Fort Wayne, and as long as the Indians remained in this area and
received ever-better annuities, these men profited. Removal of the
Indians, as William G. Ewing pointed out, would deprive the area of many
thousands of dollars distributed annually. This money, he maintained,
contributed to the upbuilding of the area.[1]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account