Outpost in the Wilderness: Fort Wayne, 1706-1828Poinsatte, Charles R.
History
Outpost in the Wilderness: Fort Wayne, 1706-1828
Poinsatte, Charles R.
Fort Wayne (Ind.) -- History
The primary importance of this treaty, aside from the surrender of land
wanted by actual settlers, is that it opened the way for the
construction of the Wabash and Erie canal. The treaty of 1826 and the
enlarged annuities it provided also made the ultimate removal of the
Indians from this area even more difficult. The frontier community of
Fort Wayne could not be disdainful of payments of specie which ran as
high as $100,000 in some years. The payments of annuities, the
distribution of gifts bought from traders and the assumption of Indian
debts were followed by a period of prosperity for agents, traders, and
land speculators.
It is no wonder that when the people of Fort Wayne learned that Tipton
had applied to the government officials to move the Indian agency from
Fort Wayne, many protested vigorously. For a long time, Tipton had
desired to remove the agency to a more central location in the Indian
country. The exploitation of the Indians at Fort Wayne was reason
enough, but Tipton had to wait for a while as the opposition was too
strong. The attitude of the traders at the treaty of 1826 gave Tipton
plenty of excuse to push the project of removal once more. In a letter
written February 7, 1827, which eventually found its way onto the Senate
floor, Tipton listed seven reasons why the agency should be removed from
Fort Wayne.[4] Not only was the agency too remote from the Indians,
argued Tipton, but it was also too close to numerous grog shops and to
the traders who sold his wards whiskey, encouraged them to run up debts
which must later be deducted from annuities, and cheated them in a
hundred different ways. Tipton cited one case in which a white woman at
Fort Wayne had purchased a shawl from a drunk squaw for seven apples and
12½ cents. This shawl had cost the squaw $3.50.
Since the removal of the Indian agency would destroy their highly
lucrative business, the traders at Fort Wayne put aside petty quarrels
and joined in common defense to prevent it. John McCorkle, as a
principal owner of real estate at Fort Wayne, wrote to Representative
William McLean from Indiana:
This settlement has been formed in consequence of the establishment of
the agency at that place. Reserves were made for the use of the agent,
thereby holding out a guarantee to the purchasers of public lands and
property, that this agency would be continued at that place until the
Indians should be removed from that country. Among others, I became a
considerable purchaser of considerable public lands, for which I paid
an extravagant price. One tract, near and adjoining the reservation
for the agency, I paid $26 per acre for.... If a removal should take
place, the Indians, as well as the inhabitants at Wayne, who have
expended their all there, will be greatly disobliged.[5]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account