Overtones, a book of temperaments : $b Richard Strauss, Parsifal, Verdi, Balzac, Flaubert, Nietzsche, and TurgénieffHuneker, James
Philosophy
Overtones, a book of temperaments : $b Richard Strauss, Parsifal, Verdi, Balzac, Flaubert, Nietzsche, and Turgénieff
Huneker, James
Music
Have not all great composers been anarchs—from Bach to Strauss? At
first blush the hard-plodding Johann Sebastian of the Well-tempered
Clavichord seems a doubtful figure to drape with the black flag of
revolt. He grew a forest of children, he worked early and late,
and he played the organ in church of Sundays; but he was a musical
revolutionist nevertheless. His music proves it. And he quarrelled
with his surroundings like any good social democrat. He even went out
for a drink during a prosy sermon, and came near being discharged
for returning late. If Lombroso were cognizant of this suspicious
fact, he might build a terrifying structure of theories, with all
sorts of inferential subcellars. However, it is Bach’s music that
still remains revolutionary. Mozart and Gluck depended too much on
aristocratic patronage to play the rôle of Solitaries. But many tales
are related of their refusal to lick the boots of the rich, to curve
the spine of the suppliant. Both were by nature gentle men, and
both occasionally arose to the situation and snubbed their patrons
outrageously. Handel! A fighter, a born revolutionist, a hater of
rulers. John Runciman—himself an anarchistic critic—calls Handel
the most magnificent man that ever lived. He was certainly the most
virile among musicians.
I recall the story of Beethoven refusing to uncover in the
presence of royalty, though his companion, Goethe, doffed his hat.
Theoretically I admire Beethoven’s independence, yet there is no
denying that the great poet was the politer of the two, and doubtless
a pleasanter man to consort with. The mythic William Tell and his
contempt for Gessler’s hat were translated into action by the
composer.
Handel, despite the fact that he could not boast Beethoven’s peasant
ancestry, had a contempt for rank and its entailed snobberies,
that was remarkable. And his music is like a blow from a muscular
fist. Haydn need not be considered. He was henpecked, and for the
same reason as was Socrates. The Croatian composer’s wife told
some strange stories of that merry little blade, her chamber-music
husband. As I do not class Mendelssohn among the great composers,
he need not be discussed. His music was Bach watered for general
consumption. Schubert was an anarch all his short life. He is
said to have loved an Esterhazy girl, and being snubbed he turned
sour-souled. He drank “far more than was good for him,” and he placed
on paper the loveliest melodies the world has ever heard. Beethoven
was the supreme anarch of art, and put into daily practice the
radicalism of his music.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account