It is characteristic of England that the exciting topics, the questions
that move the people most, have always been religious, or deeply
tinctured with religion. Conservative as Oxford is, the home of
‘impossible causes,’ she has always given asylum to new doctrines, to all
the thoughts which comfortable people call ‘dangerous.’ We have seen her
agitated by Lollardism, which never quite died, perhaps, till its eager
protest against the sacerdotal ideal was fused into the fire of the
Reformation. Oxford was literally devastated by that movement, and by
the Catholic reaction, and then was disturbed for a century and a half by
the war of Puritanism, and of Tory Anglicanism. The latter had scarcely
had time to win the victory, and to fall into a doze by her pipe of port,
when Evangelical religion came to vex all that was moderate, mature, and
fond of repose. The revolutionary enthusiasm of Shelley’s time was
comparatively feeble, because it had no connection with religion; or, at
least, no connection with the religion to which our countrymen were
accustomed. Between the era of the Revolution and our own day, two
religious tempests and one secular storm of thought have swept over
Oxford, and the University is at present, if one may say so, like a ship
in a heavy swell, the sea looking much more tranquil than it really is.
The Tractarian movement was, of course, the first of the religious
disturbances to which we refer, and much the most powerful.
It is curious to read about that movement in the _Apologia_, for example,
of Cardinal Newman. On what singular topics men’s minds were bent! what
queer survivals of the speculations of the Schools agitated them as they
walked round Christ Church meadows! They enlightened each other on
things transcendental, yet material, on matters unthinkable, and,
properly speaking, unspeakable. It is as if they ‘spoke with tongues,’
which had a meaning then, and for them, but which to us, some forty years
later, seem as meaningless as the inscriptions of Easter Island.
[Picture: Old Episcopal Palace. From a Drawing by R. Kent Thomas]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account