Oxford (England) -- History; University of Oxford -- History
Before the end of this year (1530) the town made a direct petition to
the King against the University, in which the chief incidents in the
hard-fought battle are recounted in detail. Complaint is made, for
instance, that the commissary
"Doth take fourpence for the sale of every horse-lode of fresh
salmon, & one penny of every seme of fresshe herrings, which is
extorcyon": and again "Another time he sent for one William
Falofelde & demanded of him a duty that he should give him a pint
of wine of every hogshead that he did set a-broach, for his taste.
And the said William answered and said that he knew no such duty to
be had, if he knew it he would gladly give it. And thereupon the
said Commissary said he would make him know that it was his duty &
so sent him to prison: and so ever since, for fear of imprisonment,
the said William Falofelde hath sent him wine when he sent for it,
which is to the great losse and hindrance of the said William
Falofelde."
In order to compel submission on the part of the city, the mayor and
twenty of the citizens were discommoned in 1533, so that
"no schollar nor none of their servants, should buy nor sell with
none of them, neither eat nor drink in their houses, under pain of
for every time of so doing to forfeit to the Commissary of 6s. and
8d."
For twenty years the quarrel dragged on, till at last both parties grew
weary. In 1542 arbitrators were called in, and Wolsey's charter was
repealed. But under Elizabeth, when in Leicester they had elected a
Chancellor of sufficient power to represent their interests, the
University began to endeavour to regain the privileges and franchises
which, as they maintained, had only been in abeyance. An Act of
Parliament was procured which confirmed the old obnoxious charter of
1523, but with a clause of all the liberties of the mayor and town. This
clause led the way to fresh acts of aggression on either side, and
renewed recriminations and disputes until, on the report of two judges,
a series of orders was promulgated by the Privy Council (1575), intended
to set at rest the differences between the two bodies for ever. But the
result fell short of the intention. The opposition at this time had been
led by one William Noble, who lived in the old house known as Le
Swynstock. Smarting under the sting of false imprisonment, Noble
commenced suits in the Star Chamber against the University, and
presented petitions both against that body and the mayor and citizens.
His popularity was such that he was elected Member of Parliament for the
city.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account