Oxford (England) -- History; University of Oxford -- History
"a solemn Convocation was held in S. Mary's Chancel concerning the
business forthwith to be taken in hand; which being concluded all
the Doctors and Masters went in a solemn procession to Carfax and
thence to Christ Church, where they heard Divine service, and so
they went to dinner;[33] afterwards they with some others, in
number thirty-three, that were to dispute with the Bishops, met in
Our Lady's Chapel on the North side of S. Mary's Church, and thence
going into the Chancel, placed themselves in a semi-circle by the
High Altar."
To support the platform where they sat the finials of the stalls are
said to have been then levelled. "Soon after was brought in Cranmer
(with a great number of rusty billmen), then Ridley, and last of all
Latimer, to subscribe to certain articles then proposed. They all denied
them."
On Monday, the 16th April, the Vice-Chancellor and proctors met at
Exeter College and thence went to the Divinity School, there to dispute
with the bishops on the nature of the Eucharist. The Oxford and
Cambridge doctors took their places, and the Moderator of the schools
presided in his lofty chair. Cranmer was brought in and set opposite to
the latter in the respondent's place. By his side was the mayor of the
city, in whose charge he was. Next day it was Ridley's turn, and on the
third Latimer's. So the solemn farce of the disputations, punctuated by
"opprobrious checks and reviling taunts," was gone through; the bishops
were pronounced no members of the Church, Cranmer was returned to
Bocardo, Ridley taken to the sheriff's house and Latimer to the
bailiff's. The judicial sentence followed the academical judgment.
In September 1555 a commission was sent down from London, and sat in the
Divinity School. The two bishops had looked death steadily in the face
for two years, expecting it every day or hour. It was now come. Ridley
was urged to recant, but this he firmly refused to do or to acknowledge
by word or gesture "the usurped supremacy of Rome." His cap, which he
refused to remove at the mention of the Cardinals and the Pope, was
forcibly taken off by a beadle. Latimer when examined was equally firm.
He appeared
"with a kerchief on his head and upon it a night cap or two and a
great cap such as townsmen use, with two broad flaps to button
under the chin, wearing an old threadbare Bristol frieze gown,
girded to his body with a penny leather girdle, at the which hanged
by a long string of leather his Testament and his spectacles
without a case, depending about his neck upon his breast."
Bread was bread, the aged bishop boldly declared when asked for his
views on transubstantiation, and wine was wine; there was a change in
the Sacrament it was true, but the change was not in the nature but the
dignity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account