Oxford (England) -- History; University of Oxford -- History
The Archbishop sent down a commissary, Peter Stokes, a Carmelite friar,
to Oxford, to prohibit the teaching of incorrect doctrines, but avoiding
any mention of the teacher's name. The University authorities were by no
means pleased at this invasion, so they held it, of their ancient
privileges. The Chancellor Rygge had just appointed Nicholas Hereford, a
devoted follower of Wycliffe, to preach before the University; he now
appointed a no less loyal follower, Philip Repyngdon to the same office.
His sermon was an outspoken defence of the Lollards. Stokes reported
that he dared not publish the Archbishop's mandate, that he went about
in the fear of his life; for scholars with arms concealed beneath their
gowns accompanied the preachers and it appeared that not the Chancellor
only, but both the Proctors were Wycliffites, or at least preferred to
support the Wycliffites to abating one jot of what they considered the
privileges of the University. And for once the Mayor was of the same
opinion as the rulers of the University. Still, when the Chancellor was
summoned before the Archbishop in London, he did not venture to disobey,
and promptly cleared himself of any suspicion of heresy. The council met
again at the Blackfriars, and Rygge submissively took his seat in it. On
his bended knees he apologised for his disobedience to the Archbishop's
orders, and only obtained pardon through the influence of William of
Wykeham. Short work was made of the Oxford Wycliffites; they were
generally, and four of them by name, suspended from all academical
functions. Rygge returned to Oxford, with a letter from Courtenay which
repeated the condemnation of the four preachers, adding to their names
the name of Wycliffe himself. The latter was likened by the Archbishop
to a serpent which emits noxious poison. But the Chancellor protested he
dared not execute this mandate, and a royal warrant had to be issued to
compel him. Meanwhile he showed his real feeling in the matter by
suspending a prominent opponent of the Wycliffites who had called them
by the offensive name of Lollards ("idle babblers"). But the council in
London went on to overpower the party by stronger measures.[20] Wycliffe
had apparently retired before the storm burst upon Oxford. John of Gaunt
was appealed to by the preachers named. But the great Duke of Lancaster
had no desire to incur the charge of encouraging heresy. He pronounced
the opinions of Hereford and Repyngdon on the nature of the eucharist
utterly detestable. The last hope of Lollardism was gone. Wycliffe
himself retired unmolested to Lutterworth, where he died and was buried.
"Admirable," says Fuller "that a hare so often hunted with so many packs
of dogs should die at last quietly sitting in his form." Just as he owed
his influence as a Reformer to the skill and fame as a schoolman which
he had acquired at Oxford, so now his immunity was due to his reputation
as the greatest scholastic doctor in the "second school of the Church."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account