Oxford and the Rhodes ScholarshipsScholz, R. F. (Richard Frederick)
History
Oxford and the Rhodes Scholarships
Scholz, R. F. (Richard Frederick)
Rhodes scholarships
Moral force of character is a qualification which cannot be too much
insisted upon. Cut off from home ties and home influences for three
years, with six months of each spent in travel and among strangers, with
the opportunity and at the same time the necessity to decide nearly
all questions which arise without check and with little counsel, moral
force and will power are not only invaluable, but indispensable assets.
The question of age has here an important bearing. No definite age can
be set as absolutely the best, but the general experience so far would
seem to point to a desirability that the men be mature. By that we
mean that a man should have arrived at a point where his experience,
his knowledge of himself and of men, and his knowledge both of books
and of business, render him capable of forming quick, accurate, and
independent judgements, of choosing his work, of initiating and pursuing
his own plans, of working without a task-master and independent of mere
textbooks; of carrying his plans to fulfilment, and of accomplishing his
work in spite of a multitude of distractions and side interests which
will make constant bids for his attention.
There is, however, danger in choosing too mature a man. He may be so
advanced in his studies or so old in his habits as to find Oxford
unprofitable or uncongenial. He may be so deeply interested in his
definite line of work, or ‘take himself so seriously’, as not to ‘mix’
well. He may be so set in his ways as to be unadaptable to Oxford ways.
There is such a thing as too much self-reliance. The Rhodes Scholar
should have ‘independence of character’ and should have ‘principles’,
but he should not assert an aggressive individuality. He should be able
and ready to get into sympathy with English life and English ideals; he
should remember ‘when in Rome to do as the Romans’, in so far as the
customs of the Romans do not conflict with his principles and ideals; he
should ‘catch on’, be able if necessary to rearrange his wardrobe and
his vocabulary, and to readjust his political and social vision. All this
a man may do without losing one particle of his own local or national
patriotism.
Rhodes’s favourite maxim was ‘do the comparative’. That would perhaps be
his first injunction to Rhodes Scholars. He asked for _men_—the greater
their ability the better; he did not demand the superlative; but he did
object to less than the ‘comparative’ _in any respect_.
Choice of a College.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account