The New North-road Chapel, Hoxton, is Anglo-Norman, in style; is 35
feet long, including the vestries, by 52 feet wide; built of Brick
and Bath Stone; will accommodate 1,200 persons; and cost £3,700.
The Chapel of St. John’s-square, Clerkenwell, is built of Brick and
Bath Stone; 70 feet long by 60 feet wide; will accommodate 1,300
persons; has a school-room, &c., and cost £4,000.
Jewin-street Chapel, is built in the Early English style; is 68 feet
by 52 feet; seats 1,100 persons; is built of White Brick and Bath
Stone; and cost £2,700.
The Islington Chapel, in the Liverpool road, measures 90 feet long by
54 feet wide; and will accommodate 1,500 persons. It is built of
Kentish Rag and Bath Stone; is in the decorated style and cost about
£6,000.” {159}
But the actual cost of the churches of Paddington, is not the whole of
the evil, though, considering all the circumstances, this is sufficiently
oppressive. These churches, after all, are not free: pew-rents are
obliged to be taken for the support of the ministers; the poor
parishioners have less than one-third of the room allotted to them, and a
considerable portion of this space is reserved for the best singers, and
most showy scholars of the church schools.
And after all this; after all the money raised “by compulsory levy” to
build, furnish, ornament and decorate; and after all the pew-rents are
paid; these churches do not pay their own ordinary expenses. No; not
after there is added to this income the portion of the burial-fees
received by the churchwardens; but this source of income, which has
averaged for many years more than £350 per annum, must soon cease. So
that dissenters and others, who reside even on a bishop’s estate, have a
fair prospect of being called on to pay a church-rate, after all the
churches which the rate-payers have built, shall have been paid for.
Towards defraying these ordinary expenses of the churches, the ministers
of Trinity, and All Saints, contribute fifteen per cent. of the pew-rents
received by them; the minister of St. James’s £200 per annum, the stipend
set aside for the whole cure; the minister of St. John’s, _nil_. While
for the last three or four years the pew-rents of St. Mary’s have more
than met the ordinary expenses of that church; although there have been
two Services performed in it daily during that period. And “increased
church accommodation is loudly called for in Paddington!” How will the
bishop of London, and his lessees, _now_ answer to that call? Will the
rate-payers of Paddington be left to answer it? Or, will the vestry of
this parish, elected under the provisions of Sturges Bourne’s Act, be
allowed, of their own mere motion, (without any reference to the
rate-payer, or without any efficient representation of the case “in all
its bearings,” to the bishop and his lessees), to take upon themselves to
spend more of the rate-payers’ property? We shall see.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account