Paganism Surviving in ChristianityLewis, Abram Herbert
Religion
Paganism Surviving in Christianity
Lewis, Abram Herbert
Christianity and other religions; Paganism
TERTULLIAN was a prolific writer, and one not noted for consistency. He
taught the abolition of the Sabbath (see _Against the Jews_, chapter
iv.), and refers to the observance of Sunday without giving formal
reasons therefor. But incidental references which he makes show how the
Sunday, although it had then come to be called the “Lord’s Day,” still
bore the heathen characteristics. Witness the following:
“The Holy Spirit upbraids the Jews with their holy-days. ‘Your
Sabbaths, and new moons, and ceremonies,’ says He, ‘My soul hateth.’
By us, to whom Sabbaths are strange, and the new moons and festivals
formerly beloved by God, the _Saturnalia_ and _New-Year’s_ and
_Midwinter’s_ festivals and _Matronalia_ are frequented--presents
come and go--New-Year’s Gifts--games join their noise--banquets
join their din! Oh, better fidelity of the nations to their own
sect, which claims no solemnity of the Christians for itself! Not
the Lord’s day, not Pentecost, even if they had known them, would
they have shared with us; for they would not fear lest they would
seem to be Christians. _We_ are not apprehensive least we seem to
be _heathens_! If any indulgence is to be granted to the flesh, you
have it. I will not say your own days, but more too; for to the
_heathens_, each festive day occurs but once annually; _you_ have a
festive day every eighth day. Call out the individual solemnities of
the nations and set them out into a row, they will not be able to
make up a Pentecost.”[174]
Here we have the native character of the Sunday truly set forth; a day
of “indulgence to the flesh.” Such was the legitimate, the unavoidable
fruitage of this semi-pagan festivalism, a fruitage which poisoned the
Church rapidly and almost fatally.
It is enough to add under this head, that _no writer of the first three
hundred years gives, or attempts to give_, a scriptural reason for
observing Sunday. There are no such reasons to give.
FOOTNOTES:
[161] Matt. xxviii., 1-8; Mark xvi., 2; Luke xxiv., 1-3; John xx., 1.
[162] Acts xx., 7.
[163] 1 Cor. xvi., 2.
[164] John xix., 23 and 26, and Rev. i., 10.
[165] For discussion of the time of Christ’s resurrection, see
_Biblical Teachings_, etc., by the writer.
[166] The reader will find this question discussed in detail in
“_Biblical Teachings Concerning the Sabbath and the Sunday_,” p. 26 ff.
If that is not at hand, take your Bible and Concordance, and examine
each passage in the New Testament where “Sabbath” occurs. _Cf._ also
_Sabbath Commentary_, by Bailey.
[167] For an examination of the writings, genuine and spurious, which
are adduced in favor of Sunday observance, before the time of Justin
Martyr, consult _A Critical History of the Sabbath and Sunday in the
Christian Church_, by the writer, pp. 33-69.
[168] Chap. lxvii.
[169] _Sabbath: An Examination of the Six Texts_, p. 274 _seq._,
London, 1849.
[170] _Stromata_, book v., chap. xiv.
[171] _Stromata_, book vii., chap. xii.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account