American fiction -- 20th century; Manhattan (New York, N.Y.) -- Fiction; Women artists -- Fiction
Milt's eye roved over the books on a dozen shelves. "Ah! Here are your
gods. Stendhal, Baudelaire, Flaubert, Anatole France, Huysmans, Maurice
Barrès--how I loathe that metaphysical dandy!--Nietzsche, unfortunate
madman, Ibsen, Max Stirner, William Blake, another lunatic--a nice
gang of mind-poisoners. With exception of Huysmans they are corrupters
of youth. Listen to this----" and he opened on the last page of "À
Rebours" 'Take pity, O Lord, on the Christian who doubts, on the
sceptic who seeks to believe, on the convict of life, who embarks
alone, in the night, beneath a sky no longer lit by the consoling
beacons of ancient faith.' For me, that is the saddest sentence in
all the music of your prose-men. Great artists? Yes. But guides to
damnation. Moral anarchs, their teaching will lead to the anarchy of
physical violence. Mark my words. All Europe will suffer sometime from
their doctrines. As for your Barrès, while he is no longer the anarch
of his Enemy of the Laws and is going in for nationalism nowadays,
nevertheless his is a dilettante preciosity whose gift of assimilation
is his prime quality. Also to be labelled 'dangerous', though only
for the intellectual. He possesses a barren imagination. I grant you
he writes supple, harmonious prose, though he is a mere neophyte
compared with those charming princes of corruption, Ernest Renan and
Anatole France. All your modern heroes, whom you resemble, Ulick, I am
sorry to say, derive from that abominable Julien Sorel in Stendhal's
Red and Black. The admirable antidote to that criminal, free-man,
individualist, is Robert Greslou in Paul Bourget's Disciple. Therein
you may see where unbridled indulgence, whether in thought or act, will
lead a young man. What are you writing just now, Ulick?" Milt took up
some sheets from the desk.
"Oh, this a very bad. What next? 'Ideas and Images of Evil.' That's
simply a Baudelairian title, and while that wonderful poet--yes, I
won't deny that I have read him with more interest than the atheist
Victor Hugo--recognized the existence of evil, of a personal devil,
Satan or Lucifer, he didn't fall down and worship him." "How about the
Litany of Satan"? interrupted Ulick. "It is to be read in a Manichean
sense. It is objective" "And how about Carducci's Hymn to Satan? ('Inno
a Satana')
"Salute, O Satana
O ribellione
O forza vindice
Della ragione."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account