Paper & paper making, ancient and modernHerring, Richard
History
Paper & paper making, ancient and modern
Herring, Richard
Papermaking
Post paper seems to have derived its name from the post-horn,
which at one time was its distinguishing mark. It does not appear
to have been used prior to the establishment of the general
post-office (1670), when it became the custom to blow a horn, to
which circumstance no doubt we may attribute its introduction. The
mark is still frequently used, but the same change which has so much
diminished the number of painted signs in the streets of our towns
and cities, has nearly made paper-marks a matter of antiquarian
curiosity; the maker’s name being now generally used, and the mark,
in the few instances where it still remains, serving the purpose of
mere ornament, rather than that of distinction.
Water-marks, however, have at various periods been the means of
detecting frauds, forgeries and impositions, in our courts of law
and elsewhere, to say nothing of the protection they afford in the
instances already referred to, such as bank notes, cheques, receipt,
bill, and postage stamps. The celebrated Curran once distinguished
himself in a case which he had undertaken, by shrewdly referring
to the water-mark, which effectually determined the verdict. And
another instance, which I introduce merely in the form of an amusing
anecdote, occurred once at Messina, where the monks of a certain
monastery exhibited, with great triumph, a letter as being written
by the Virgin Mary with her own hand. Unluckily for them, however,
this was not, as it easily might have been, written upon the ancient
papyrus, but on paper made of rags. On one occasion a visitor, to
whom this was shown, observed, with affected solemnity, that the
letter involved also a _miracle_, for the paper on which it was
written was not in existence until several centuries after the mother
of our Lord had died.
A further illustration of the kind occurs in a work entitled
“Ireland’s Confessions,” which was published respecting his
fabrication of the Shakspeare manuscripts,—a literary forgery even
still more remarkable, I think, than that which is said to have been
perpetrated by Chatterton, as Rowley’s Poems.
The interest which at the time was universally felt in this
production of Ireland’s, may be partially gathered from the fact,
that the whole of the original edition, which appeared in the form
of a shilling pamphlet, was disposed of in a few hours; while so
great was the eagerness to obtain copies afterwards, that single
impressions were sold in an auction room at the extravagant price of
a guinea.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account