Papers and Proceedings of the Twenty-Third General Meeting of the American Library Association: Held at Waukesha, Wisconsin, July 4-10, 1901
Science
Papers and Proceedings of the Twenty-Third General Meeting of the American Library Association: Held at Waukesha, Wisconsin, July 4-10, 1901
American Library Association; Library science -- Congresses
CHAIRMAN: It is not designed that the use of dates be intended only for
distinguishing writers, but it is urged that dates be given extensively.
Mr. BOWKER: Doesn't that mean that the dates should be used where the
authors are not of the same names?
CHAIRMAN: Yes.
Mr. BOWKER: In the case of living authors, is it intended to give date
of birth if possible?
CHAIRMAN: Yes.
Miss BROWNE: At the Boston Athenæum for years they have been giving
those dates on their cards, and now they are scratching them off.
Mr. BOWKER: Does anybody know why?
Miss BROWNE: I believe they consider they are not as desirable as a
means of distinction as some phrase might be, and so they scratch off
the date and give, for instance, "Henry James, _Novelist_; Emerson,
_Essayist_."
Miss WAGNER: How would they classify William Morris?
A MEMBER: Or Andrew Lang?
CHAIRMAN: The next question is the following recommendation of the
committee: "_The committee recommends that the Central Bureau prepare a
biographical card giving the fullest form of name, dates, official and
honorary titles and degrees, membership of academies, etc., and all
forms of names and pseudonyms used._"
Mr. FLETCHER: I suppose the idea is to prepare a biographical card for
each author for whom any card is issued. I don't know exactly how it
should be worked. I want to call your attention to the fact that the
Advocates' Library of Edinburgh tried this in preparing the first two
volumes of their catalog; and when they got the two volumes printed
they concluded it was too expensive, and gave it up. I wonder how many
libraries would advocate that the Library of Congress shall furnish us
cards, not only for the books, but whenever an author comes for whom
they have not furnished such a card that they shall furnish us a
biographical card, which we shall pay for? I do not understand that the
Library of Congress is preparing such a card now. It may be worthy of
discussion whether we want such a card prepared.
Miss AMBROSE: It seems to me a card of that kind would be extremely
helpful in smaller libraries that are limited in biographical books.
Mr. JONES: I would suggest that in the case of authors for whom we most
need those facts, new authors, the facts would not be available. Could
we have a copyright note by which each author should furnish the desired
facts?
CHAIRMAN: Mr. Hanson could answer that, perhaps.
Mr. HANSON: I have familiarity with copyright authors that many
librarians do not meet with, but whom we must have information about to
distinguish from other well-known authors of the same name. We have a
method of getting at them through the copyright records, and we write
them, sending a blank, and occasionally ask them to give information of
their other works. That is put on a preliminary card, and before every
new author such a biographical card is inserted. I believe this is an
old practice, used in many libraries.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account