In the autumn of 1877 Dr Da Silva Lima published an article in the ‘Gazeta Medica da Bahia,’ in which he dwelt upon the labors and merits of Wucherer, and, judging from an omission in one of my memoirs, he supposed that I had insufficiently acknowledged Wucherer’s claims. A translation of this article appeared in the ‘Archives de Médicine Navale,’ with an important appendix by Dr le Roy de Méricourt. In this _addendum_ the French _savant_ showed that the omission on my part was unintentional, and had been corrected by me in a later memoir. Not only had I been amongst the earliest in England to enforce Wucherer’s claims in respect of the micro-Filariæ, but I had first announced his discoveries in connection with _Anchylostoma duodenale_. In my translation of Wucherer’s memoir (‘Ueber die Anchylostomum Krankheit’) I spoke of the melancholy satisfaction I had in knowing that the memoir in question was “among the last that appeared from the pen of that gifted and amiable physician.” Some notice of Dr Lima’s paper and its appendix by Dr A. le Roy de Méricourt appeared in the ‘Lancet’ for Jan. 5th, 1878, and I also published a full translation of it, with explanatory notes, in the ‘Veterinarian’ for Feb., 1878. Later on, in the ‘Lancet’ (March 23rd, 1878), Dr Da Silva Lima published an interesting letter correcting a misconception that had incidentally arisen in the mind of a commentator (on the Helminthological work of 1877), and at the same time he pointed to the original facts connected with the discovery of Wucherer’s Filaria. As my views are in perfect accord with those of Dr Da Silva Lima, I can only regret that errors of interpretation should have crept into the discussion. Dr Lima honorably recognises the nomenclature (_Filaria Bancrofti_) which I proposed for the adult worm, and only claims for Wucherer that which is fairly due.